Conservation, the sum rule and confirmation

Philosophy of Science 44 (1):95-106 (1977)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/288726
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Quantum Realism: Naïveté is No Excuse.Richard Healey - 1979 - Synthese 42 (1):121 - 144.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Values, Advocacy and Conservation Biology.Jay Odenbaugh - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (1):55 - 69.
The Sum Rule is Well-Confirmed.Clark Glymour - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (1):86-94.
The Sum Rule has Not Been Tested.Nancy Cartwright - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (1):107-112.
Choosing Between Confirmation Theories.R. G. Swinburne - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (4):602-613.
Can a Sum Change its Parts?D. H. Sanford - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):235-239.
From Relative Confirmation to Real Confirmation.Aron Edidin - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):265-271.
Tests of Significance Violate the Rule of Implication.Davis Baird - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:81 - 92.
Experimental Tests of the Sum Rule.M. L. G. Redhead - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (1):50-64.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

3 ( #687,692 of 2,153,830 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,830 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums