«Direct» and «indirect»: A reply to critics of our action theory

The Thomist 65 (1):1-44 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Davidson Should Have Said.Ernest LePore & Barry Loewer - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):65-78.
Arguments Against Direct Realism and How to Counter Them.Pierre le Morvan - 2004 - American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (3):221-234.
Two Visual Systems but Only One Theory of Perception.Darren Burke & William G. Hayward - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):100-100.
Direct Discrimination, Indirect Discrimination and Autonomy.Oran Doyle - 2007 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (3):537-553.
A Reconsideration of Indirect Duties Regarding Non-Human Organisms.Toby Svoboda - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (2):311-323.
Direct and Indirect Consciousness.Lester Embree - 2006 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 37 (1):1-8.
The Puzzle of Free Indirect Discourse.Yael Sharvit - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (3):353-395.
Direct and Indirect Action Revisited.Christopher Tollefsen - 2000 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (4):653-670.
Is Virtue Ethics Self-Effacing?Joel A. Martinez - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):277-288.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-19

Downloads
37 (#312,651)

6 months
34 (#31,751)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Finnis
Oxford University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references