Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (4):422-424 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Within the debate concerning reason and rationality, instrumental incoherence was for a long time conceived of as the paradigm of irrationality. However, with the emergence of the so-called ‘bootstrapping objection’ and the debate concerning the ‘scope’ of rational requirements, the innocuous status of the normative significance of (instrumental) coherence became subject to. This led to a paradigmatic shift in how to understand the relationship between rational requirements and normativity. While there now exists considerable doubt that rational requirements are normative, it is commonly agreed that one’s normative point of view is a key feature of one’s rationality. Here the question is not only if one can hold a particular normative judgement and still be rational; what is significant too is whether your normative outlook coheres appropriately with your motivation. In fact, it is now commonly agreed that rationality requires us to intend to make the world fit with our first-personal ought beliefs. Enkrasia (i.e. coherence between your normative views and your motivation) is thus seen as a rational ideal and as a source of rational requirements. Nevertheless, many elementary questions regarding the application, content, and significance of an enkrasia-requirement remain unanswered, or subject to debate. This special issue on ‘The Nature of the Enkratic Requirement of Rationality’ aims to answer some of these fundamental questions.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial.Heinz Streib & Editorial Team - 2012 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 34 (1):1-2.
Editorial.Gabriele Cornelli - 2013 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 11:7-8.
In memoriam.Helder Buenos Aires de Carvalho - 2010 - Cadernos Do Pet Filosofia 1 (2):p.1.
Editorial. Rsc - 1998 - Utilitas 10 (3):ii-ii.
Editorial.Wellington Damasceno Almeida - 2014 - Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 19 (2):5-7.
Editorial.S. M. - 1993 - Mind 102 (406):1-8.
Editorial.Juan Diego Bogotá Johnson - 2014 - Saga - Revista de Estudiantes de Filosofía 15 (26):8-9.
Editorial.Not Available Not Available - 1998 - Ethik in der Medizin 10 (2):63-63.
Executive Editorial Committee and Editorial Board.[author unknown] - 2011 - Radical Philosophy Review 14 (2):264-264.
Editorial.B. C. - 1979 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37 (4):399-400.
Editorial.F. J. - 1976 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (4):395-396.
Editorial.F. J. - 1987 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (3):227-228.
Editorial.Robin le Poidevin - 2013 - Camrbridge Core Philosophy 49 (1):1-3.
Editorial.F. J. - 1977 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (3):261-263.


Added to PP

218 (#93,280)

6 months
80 (#61,121)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julian Fink
Universität Bayreuth

Citations of this work

Rationality is Not Coherence.Nora Heinzelmann - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 74 (1):312-332.
Vom Sollen zum Sein.Nora Heinzelmann - 2021 - In Georgios Karageorgoudis and Jörg Noller (ed.), Sein und Sollen. Paderborn, Deutschland: pp. 199-220.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references