Editorial

Organon F 20 (4):422-424 (2013)
Authors
Julian Fink
Universität Bayreuth
Abstract
Within the debate concerning reason and rationality, instrumental incoherence was for a long time conceived of as the paradigm of irrationality. However, with the emergence of the so-called ‘bootstrapping objection’ and the debate concerning the ‘scope’ of rational requirements, the innocuous status of the normative significance of (instrumental) coherence became subject to. This led to a paradigmatic shift in how to understand the relationship between rational requirements and normativity. While there now exists considerable doubt that rational requirements are normative, it is commonly agreed that one’s normative point of view is a key feature of one’s rationality. Here the question is not only if one can hold a particular normative judgement and still be rational; what is significant too is whether your normative outlook coheres appropriately with your motivation. In fact, it is now commonly agreed that rationality requires us to intend to make the world fit with our first-personal ought beliefs. Enkrasia (i.e. coherence between your normative views and your motivation) is thus seen as a rational ideal and as a source of rational requirements. Nevertheless, many elementary questions regarding the application, content, and significance of an enkrasia-requirement remain unanswered, or subject to debate. This special issue on ‘The Nature of the Enkratic Requirement of Rationality’ aims to answer some of these fundamental questions.
Keywords rational requirements  Enkrasia
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Editorial.Heinz Streib & Editorial Team - 2012 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 34 (1):1-2.
Editorial.Gabriele Cornelli - 2013 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 11 (13):7-8.
In memoriam.Helder Buenos Aires de Carvalho - 2010 - Cadernos Do Pet Filosofia 1 (2):p.1.
Editorial. Rsc - 1998 - Utilitas 10 (3):ii-ii.
Editorial.Wellington Damasceno Almeida - 2014 - Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 19 (2):5-7.
Editorial.S. M. - 1993 - Mind 102 (406):1-8.
Editorial.Juan Diego Bogotá Johnson - 2014 - Saga - Revista de Estudiantes de Filosofía 15 (26):8-9.
Editorial.Not Available Not Available - 1998 - Ethik in der Medizin 10 (2):63-63.
Executive Editorial Committee and Editorial Board.[author unknown] - 2011 - Radical Philosophy Review 14 (2):264-264.
Editorial.B. C. - 1979 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37 (4):399-400.
Editorial. Tjd - 1985 - Camrbridge Core Philosophy 25 (2):1-8.
Editorial: Logos and Parole: Editorial.Mary Tiles - 1987 - Philosophy 62 (241):267-268.
Editorial.F. J. - 1976 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (4):395-396.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-11-13

Total downloads
24 ( #254,221 of 2,275,405 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #152,413 of 2,275,405 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature