Organon F 20 (4):422-424 (2013)
Within the debate concerning reason and rationality, instrumental incoherence was for a long time conceived of as the paradigm of irrationality. However, with the emergence of the so-called ‘bootstrapping objection’ and the debate concerning the ‘scope’ of rational requirements, the innocuous status of the normative significance of (instrumental) coherence became subject to. This led to a paradigmatic shift in how to understand the relationship between rational requirements and normativity. While there now exists considerable doubt that rational requirements are normative, it is commonly agreed that one’s normative point of view is a key feature of one’s rationality. Here the question is not only if one can hold a particular normative judgement and still be rational; what is significant too is whether your normative outlook coheres appropriately with your motivation. In fact, it is now commonly agreed that rationality requires us to intend to make the world fit with our first-personal ought beliefs. Enkrasia (i.e. coherence between your normative views and your motivation) is thus seen as a rational ideal and as a source of rational requirements. Nevertheless, many elementary questions regarding the application, content, and significance of an enkrasia-requirement remain unanswered, or subject to debate. This special issue on ‘The Nature of the Enkratic Requirement of Rationality’ aims to answer some of these fundamental questions.
|Keywords||rational requirements Enkrasia|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Editorial.Gabriele Cornelli - 2013 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 11 (13):7-8.
Editorial.Juan Diego Bogotá Johnson - 2014 - Saga - Revista de Estudiantes de Filosofía 15 (26):8-9.
Editorial: The Scholar's Degree, The Prize for the English Essay: Editorial.Ross Harrison - 1990 - Philosophy 65 (253):251-252.
Executive Editorial Committee and Editorial Board.[author unknown] - 2011 - Radical Philosophy Review 14 (2):264-264.
Added to index2016-11-13
Total downloads8 ( #495,901 of 2,177,980 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,387 of 2,177,980 )
How can I increase my downloads?