PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:130 - 139 (1976)
In view of several accounts of Galileo (as an "anarchist", Aristotelian-Thomist, Platonist, empiricist, and apriorist), this paper argues that, though the continued vitality of these interpretations indicates the uniqueness of Galileo's place in the philosophy of science, the philosophical importance of each depends on denying the alternatives; then proposes a synthetic approach as a solution; identifies it as a tradition; discusses its best and latest example (Clavelin); accepts the essential point of his account of Galileo's method (the skillful combination of thought and observation); and defines the novelty of his contribution as the analysis from that point of view of new elements of Galileo's work. However, it is argued that Clavelin's account of Galileo's theory of method does not do justice to the complexity and wealth of Galileo's philosophical remarks, and hence a new approach is suggested such that the essential feature of Galileo's philosophy of science becomes his skillful combination of scientific practice and philosophical theorizing.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Paradox of Conceptual Novelty and Galileo's Use of Experiments.Maarten Van Dyck - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):864-875.
The Paradox of Conceptual Novelty and Galileo's Use of Experiments.Maarten Dycvank - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):864-875.
Galileo's Interventionist Notion of "Cause&Quot.Steffen Ducheyne - 2006 - Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (3):443-464.
Patterns of Argumentation in Galileo'sDiscorsi.Marta Fehér - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):17-24.
Review of Maurice A. Finocchiaro: Defending Copernicus and Galileo: Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs. [REVIEW]Peter Slezak - 2011 - Science and Education 20 (1):71-81.
Patterns of Argumentation in Galileo's Discorsi.Marta Feh - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):17 – 24.
Aspects of Aristotelian Statics in Galileo's Dynamics.J. Groot - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):645-664.
Galileo as a 'Bad Theologian': A Formative Myth About Galileo's Trial.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (4):753-791.
Die Wissenschaftstheorie Galileis — Oder: Contra Feyerabend. [REVIEW]Klaus Fischer - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):165 - 197.
Galileo and Prior Philosophy.David Atkinson - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):115-136.
The Louvain Lectures of Bellarmine and the Autograph Copy of His 1616 Declaration to Galileo, And: The Galileo Affair: A Meeting of Faith and Science.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1988 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (1):149-151.
Science Meets Biblical Exegesis in the Galileo Affair.Sj George V. Coyne - 2013 - Zygon 48 (1):221-229.
Galileo, Hobbes, and the Book of Nature.Douglas Michael Jesseph - 2004 - Perspectives on Science 12 (2):191-211.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads14 ( #329,731 of 2,158,357 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #355,511 of 2,158,357 )
How can I increase my downloads?