Authors
James Gordon Finlayson
University of Sussex
Abstract
‘Immanent criticism' has been discussed by philosophers of quite different persuasions, working in separate areas and in different traditions of philosophy. Almost all of them agree on roughly the same story about its origins: It is that Hegel invented immanent criticism, that Marx later developed it, and that the various members of the Frankfurt School, particularly Adorno, refined it in various ways, and that they are all paradigmatic practitioners of immanent criticism. I call this the Continuity Thesis. There are four different claims that interest me. Hegel is the originator of immanent criticism. Hegel's dialectical method is that of immanent criticism. Adorno practises immanent criticism and endorses the term as a description of his practice. Adorno's dialectical method is fundamentally Hegelian. In this article, I offer an account of immanent criticism, on the basis of which, I evaluate these four claims and argue that the Continuity Thesis should be rejected
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2014.993918
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,480
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Problems of Moral Philosophy.Theodor W. Adorno - 2000 - Stanford University Press.
Reason, Recognition, and Internal Critique.Antti Kauppinen - 2002 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):479 – 498.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Citizen Skeptic: Cicero’s Academic Republicanism.Scott Aikin - 2015 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 2 (3):275–285.
Idealism and the Metaphysics of Individuality.Paul Giladi - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (2):208-229.
Beyond Argument: A Hegelian Approach to Deep Disagreements.Connie Wang - forthcoming - Symposion. Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Adorno, Hegel and the Concrete Universal.C. Baumann - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (1):73-94.
La Critique Hégélienne.Jacques D'Hondt - 1999 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 189 (2):169-180.
The Virtues of Circular Reasoning.Kevin L. Stoehr - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:159-171.
Dialectic and Social Criticism.Sean Sayers - 2007 - Spartacus 9 (89):86-90.
Adorno and Extreme Evil.Espen Hammer - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):75-93.
An Immanent Criticism of Lakatos' Account of the 'Degenerating Phase' of Bohr's Atomic Theory.Hans Radder - 1982 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13 (1):99-109.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-01-15

Total views
40 ( #236,682 of 2,330,623 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #151,630 of 2,330,623 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes