Institutional animal care and use committees: A new set of clothes for the emperor?

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):145-158 (1988)
Abstract
According to some proponents and critics of research using animals, the greatest hope for improved conditions for laboratory animals is to be found in the system of self-regulation called for by recent legislation and the NIH's revised policy. This article explores advantages and disadvantages of relying on "Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees" to subject research proposals to ethical scrutiny. Among the advantages discussed are: institutional dialogue concerning the ethics of research; inclusion of perspectives of nonscientists in such dialogues; and the possibility of improved research proposals. Despite these advantages, I argue that serious problems with the committee system may limit the degree to which conditions for animals are actually improved. Disadvantages discussed include: limitations in the scope of the review process, and built-in bias in favor of certain philosophical stances in the composition of the committees. Keywords: laboratory animals, ethics review committees, self-regulation, NIH policy, Animal Welfare Act CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/13.2.145
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,567
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Protection of Animal Research Subjects.Czesław Radzikowski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):103-110.
The Protection of Laboratory Animals: A Response to Stephenson.James Parker - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (4):389-394.
Standards for Animal Research: Looking at the Middle.Rebecca Dresser - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):123-143.
Information Resources for Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees: [1985-1999].Tim Allen & Michael D. Kreger (eds.) - 2000 - U.S. Dept. Of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Agricultural Library, Animal Welfare Information Center.
Ethical Decision Making About Animal Experiments.F. Barbara Orlans - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):163 – 171.
Approving the Use of Animals in Medical Education.Farol N. Tomson - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (1).
Added to PP index
2010-08-19

Total downloads
5 ( #607,107 of 2,180,841 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,822 of 2,180,841 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums