Legal oughts, Normative Transmission, and the Nazi Use of Analogy

Jurisprudence 3 (2):445-463 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1935, the Nazi government introduced what came to be known as the abrogation of the pro- hibition of analogy. This measure, a feature of the new penal law, required judges to stray from the letter of the written law and to consider instead whether an action was worthy of pun- ishment according to the ‘sound perception of the people’ and the ‘underlying principle’ of existing criminal statutes. In discussions of Nazi law, an almost unanimous conclusion is that a system of criminal law ought not to contain legislation of this sort. This conclusion is often based on how the abro- gation relates to the normative claim that the law ought to be predictable. In particular, it has been argued that since the law ought to be predictable, and since this type of analogy legis- lation implied, caused or contributed to the diminution of the law’s predictability, this type of legislation ought to be prohibited. In this paper, we argue that this argument is not entirely correct. While we believe that the law ought to be predictable and that there is evidence for the claim that the Nazis’ intro- duction of analogical reasoning implied, caused, or contributed to a diminution of predictability, this fact is logically too weak to ground the conclusion that necessarily a penal system ought not to contain legislation of this kind. Despite the undeniable wickedness of the Nazi penal system, this type of analogical reasoning can be made consistent with the pre- dictability of the law. We argue that consistency of this sort depends on whether the use of analogy is supplemented by certain contextual background conditions. The occurrence of these conditions blocks an inference from the fact that the law ought to be predictable to the conclusion that a penal system ought not to allow for this type of analogical reasoning.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analogical Reasoning.Jefferson White - 1996 - In Dennis M. Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell. pp. 571–577.
New Perspectives on Nazi Law.Carolyn Benson & Julian Fink - 2012 - Jurisprudence 3 (2):341-346.
Against the Reductionism of an Economic Analysis of Contract Law.Sina Akbari - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 28 (2):245-264.
Law as a Bridge Between Is and Ought.Edgar Bodenheimer - 1988 - Ratio Juris 1 (2):137-153.
Analogy.Todd Davies - 1985 - In CSLI Informal Notes Series, IN-CSLI-4. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
The Logic of Analogy.Avi Sion - 2023 - USA: Amazon/Kindle.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-23

Downloads
869 (#21,122)

6 months
116 (#54,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julian Fink
Universität Bayreuth

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references