PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:235 - 246 (1978)
Feyerabend's views are construed as formulating the problem of determining the role of rhetoric in scientific rationality and posing the solution-theory that scientific rationality is essentially rhetorical. He is taken to give three arguments against reason, of which the one from the insufficiency of reason and the one from incommensurability are shown to presuppose his historical argument; his historical argument is based on his account of Galileo, which hinges essentially on Feyerabend's analysis of the tower argument. This analysis is insightful in certain important ways but misconceived in others. Feyerabend's main error is to see a conflict between reason and rhetoric, where none exists; it is argued that rhetorical devices have their own standards of propriety and impropriety, different from those of rational arguments, and that at the same time sound rhetorical analysis presupposes sound logical analysis.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Galileo's Response to the Tower Argument.William K. Goosens - 1980 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 11 (3):215-227.
Similar books and articles
Scientific Discourse and the Rhetoric of Globalization: The Impact of Culture and Language.Carmen Pérez-Llantada - 2012 - Continuum.
Rhetoric, Science, and Philosophy.John O'neill - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (2):205--25.
Goodbye and Farewell: Siegel Vs. Feyerabend.Alfred Nordmann - 1990 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 33 (3):317 – 331.
The Scientific Community as Audience: Toward a Rhetorical Analysis of Science.Michael A. Overington - 1977 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 10 (3):143 - 164.
Feyerabend and Scientific Values: Tightrope-Walking Rationality.Robert Farrell - 2003 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
The Role of Rhetoric in Rational Argumentation.Nicholas Rescher - 1997 - Argumentation 12 (2):315-323.
Practical and Scientific Rationality: A Difficulty for Levi's Epistemology.Wayne Backman - 1983 - Synthese 57 (3):269 - 276.
Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views.Donald G. Douglas - 1973 - Skokie, Ill., National Textbook Co..
The Philosophical Requirements for an Adequate Conception of Scientific Rationality.Gerald Doppelt - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):104-133.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads12 ( #378,467 of 2,171,877 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,614 of 2,171,877 )
How can I increase my downloads?