Science, Method, and Argument in Galileo: Philosophical, Historical, and Historiographical Essays

Springer Verlag (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book collects a renowned scholar's essays from the past five decades and reflects two main concerns: an approach to logic that stresses argumentation, reasoning, and critical thinking and that is informal, empirical, naturalistic, practical, applied, concrete, and historical; and an interest in Galileo’s life and thought—his scientific achievements, Inquisition trial, and methodological lessons in light of his iconic status as “father of modern science.” These republished essays include many hard to find articles, out of print works, and chapters which are not available online. The collection provides an excellent resource of the author's lifelong dedication to the subject. Thus, the book contains critical analyses of some key Galilean arguments about the laws of falling bodies and the Copernican hypothesis of the earth’s motion. There is also a group of chapters in which Galileo’s argumentation is compared and contrasted with that of other figures such as Socrates, Karl Marx, Giordano Bruno, and his musicologist father Vincenzo Galilei. The chapters on Galileo’s trial illustrate an approach to the science-vs-religion issue which Finocchiaro labels “para-clerical” and conceptualizes in terms of a judicious consideration of arguments for and against Galileo and the Church. Other essays examine argumentation about Galileo’s life and thought by the major Galilean scholars of recent decades. The book will be of interest to scholars in philosophy, logic, philosophy of science, history of science, history of religion, philosophy of religion, argumentation, rhetoric, and communication studies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Rejection of Space-Proportional Speed

This essay attempts to provide a critical understanding of the famous passage in Galileo’s Discourse on Two New Sciences where he rejects the idea that the speed of a falling body increases in proportion to the distance traversed. Accordingly, a new English translation of the passage is made. Severa... see more

Critique of the Ship-Experiment Argument

This essay is part of a critical comparison between Galileo’s defense of Copernicanism and the defense of Galileo from the many attempts to criticize his reasoning or to justify his condemnation by the Inquisition. In such a context, I examine the anti-Copernican argument based on the ship’s mast ex... see more

A Galilean Fallacy of Equivocation

In an attempt to illustrate and justify the relevance and usefulness of logic in the study of the history of science, Galileo’s refutation of space-proportionality as found in Two New Sciences is analyzed in the light of some recent historical reinterpretations and with an awareness and appreciation... see more

Arguing About the Earth’s Motion

Galileo’s Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican can be read from the viewpoints of methodological judgment and critical reasoning; methodological judgment means the avoidance of one-sidedness and extremes; and critical reasoning means reasoning aimed at the analysis and e... see more

Explanation of the Law of Squares

In applying the theory of explanation as understanding to the history of science, the problem of the growth of understanding is formulated. To help solve this problem, Galileo’s main scientific achievement is interpreted as a reduction of something not understood to something understood, i.e., as an... see more

Charity, Logic, and Para-Clericalism: Agassi on Explaining Galileo’s Trial

This essay is a critical examination of Joseph Agassi’s article “On Explaining the Trial of Galileo,” which was a critical examination of Arthur Koestler’s account. It focuses partly on several of Agassi’s insightful substantive theses. These involve Galileo’s skill in the art of reasoning and criti... see more

The Berkeley Para-Clerical Approach

Recently, the Galileo affair has been studied by several scholars whom I label “Berkeley para-clericals,” chiefly philosopher Paul Feyerabend and historian John Heilbron. Their approach is distinctive: it views controversial topics involving the relationship between science and religion from a persp... see more

Galileo Under Fire and Under Patronage

This essay explores three challenging ironies in Galileo’s career, involving the viewpoints of leisure, adversity, and intellectual achievement. Before 1610, as a university professor at Padua and employee of the Venetian Republic, he had the liberty and protection to conduct significant and unortho... see more

Prison and Torture as False but Well-Founded Myths

This essay discusses two common myths about the Inquisition trial of Galileo: that he was tortured during the proceedings, and that he was imprisoned as punishment for his alleged crime. The truth is that although Galileo underwent an interrogation with the verbal threat of torture, he did not under... see more

Authenticity vs. Accuracy vs. Legitimacy: Pagano on the Vatican Documents

This essay is a critical appreciation of the scholarly work on Galileo’s trial by Mons. Sergio Pagano . Pagano has argued convincingly that the 1616 precept to Galileo by Inquisition commissary Seghizzi is authentic and not a forgery. This is an important accomplishment because it settles a controve... see more

From Religion vs. Science to Science vs. Religion: McMullin on the Church and Galileo

This essay is a critical examination of the volume The Church and Galileo , edited by Ernan McMullin and containing thirteen contributions by various scholars. I provide a description of the origin and content of the volume, and a brief account of its minor blemishes. I then focus on two issues stre... see more

Legal Formalities and Improprieties: Mayer on the Inquisition Trying Galileo

This essay is a critical examination of Thomas Mayer’s The Roman Inquisition: Trying Galileo . I argue that Mayer’s book does have a few small merits: it displays considerable diligence and hard work in archival research; its legal orientation is potentially fruitful; its prosopographical approach p... see more

Galileo’s Daughter: The Book, the Movie, the Facts, and the Issues

This essay examines Galileo’s relationship to the eldest of his three children, named Virginia, who became a nun with the name of Sister Maria Celeste. It contains a commentary on Dava Sobel’s best-selling book Galileo’s Daughter: A Historical Memoir of Science, Faith, and Love . It also contains a ... see more

Galileo’s Father: Method and Argument in Musicology, Physics, and Astronomy

This is a critical analysis of the relationship between Galileo’s Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican and his father Vincenzo’s Dialogue on Ancient and Modern Music . The analysis is carried out with the awareness that Vincenzo practiced systematically the experimental ... see more

Socrates, Galileo, and Marx as Critical Thinkers

One approach to teaching critical thinking and theorizing about it is to study great exemplars like Socrates, Galileo, and Marx, and to undertake a critical comparison and contrast of them. In this essay, I discuss this approach by reporting on a university course I have taught for more than 30 year... see more

Painting vs. Sculpture in the Cigoli Letter

This essay is partly a case study of the role of logic in historiography. It is also partly a test case for the thesis of a Galilean correspondence between aesthetic attitude and scientific thought, advanced by Erwin Panofsky, Alexandre Koyré, and John Heilbron. Intrinsically, it is a discussion of ... see more

The Trials of Bruno and Galileo

This essay undertakes a critical comparison and contrast between the Inquisition trials of Giordano Bruno and of Galileo. It focuses not only the facts of the two cases, but also on the procedures followed during the proceedings; on the causes and issues for their respective condemnations; and on th... see more

Koyré’s Études galiléennes: Critical Reasoning vs. A Priori Rationalism

This essay is an attempt to determine the adequacy of the technique of error analysis characteristic of Alexander Koyré’s historiography, and more specifically to determine the soundness of his interpretation of Galileo; thus, the essay focuses on the part of Koyré’s Études galiléennes that criticiz... see more

Feyerabend’s Against Method: Rationalism vs. Pseudo-irrationalism

This is a critical examination of Paul Feyerabend’s Against Method . I argue that, although Feyerabend’s book may superficially appear as primarily destructive, he is really practicing a relatively novel and essentially sound approach to the analysis of scientific rationality; Feyerabend’s approach ... see more

Crombie’s Galileo’s Natural Philosophy: Disputation vs. Demonstration vs. Argumentation

In the context of a critical examination of Alistair C. Crombie’s unpublished typescript Galileo’s Natural Philosophy, I explore several themes that are intrinsically important and widely present in Galileo’s scientific practice and methodological reflections. Crombie’s typescript is impressive for ... see more

Shapere’s Galileo: Philosophy vs. History vs. Erudition

In an attempt to understand and to evaluate Dudley Shapere’s Galileo: A Philosophical Study, a number of philosophical problems, ideas, and opportunities concerning the study of Galileo are discussed. As a basis for discussion, a summary of the book is first given. Then, to avoid misunderstanding cr... see more

Wallace’s Galileo and His Sources: Suppositional vs. Hypothetical Reasoning

This is a critical examination of William Wallace’s Galileo and His Sources: The Heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo’s Science . I argue that Wallace’s book is a noteworthy contribution to the history of philosophy, the history of science, Medieval and Renaissance studies, and Galilean schola... see more

Drake on Galileo: Science vs. Philosophy, Methodology vs. Metaphysics

This is a critical examination of two books by Stillman Drake, Galileo Against the Philosophers and Galileo at Work . Drake argues that Galileo’s science was deeply experimental and importantly anti-philosophical. I appreciate Drake’s argument for the experimental nature of Galileo’s science; but I ... see more

Camerota’s Galileo Galilei e la cultura scientifica: Between Ptolemy and Copernicus?

This essay is a critical examination of Michele Camerota’s Galileo Galilei e la cultura scientifica nell’età della Controriforma . I argue that Camerota’s biography of Galileo is welcome for its timeliness, useful for its breadth, valuable for its depth, usually well-documented, and often insightful... see more

Similar books and articles

Galileo and the Philosophy of Science.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:130 - 139.
The Cambridge Companion to Galileo (JR Milton).P. Machamer - 2000 - Philosophical Books 41 (1):29-30.
On Galileo's Method of Causal Proportionality.Donald W. Mertz - 1980 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 11 (3):229.
The Cambridge Companion to Galileo.Peter Machamer (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-09

Downloads
10 (#1,160,791)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Notice of Books Received. [REVIEW]Informal Logic - 2021 - Informal Logic 42 (3):343-357.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references