Sinking the research lifeboat

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):197-212 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX


situation is one in which all are in great peril and someone must be sacrificed lest all perish. In such situations, it is permissible to do things which would be considered wrong under less drastic circumstances. Proponents of animal rights such as Tom Regan agree that in such circumstances it may be necessary to sacrifice a dog in order to save human life. Is such an admission consistent with calling for the abolition of all scientific research on animals? That is, is scientific research a ‘lifeboat’? The analogy is tempting but flawed. The demand for abolition of animal research is not marred by consistency on this score. Keywords: abolition, animal research, animal rights, lifeboat cases, Tom Regan CiteULike Connotea What's this?



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,659

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

After Regan: Animal Rights and Lifeboat Scenarios.Grace Clement - 2021 - Journal of Animal Ethics 11 (1):99-104.
Rejecting an Additive Solution to Regan’s Lifeboat Case.Daniel Kary - 2024 - Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research 6 (1):53-72.
On justifying the exploitation of animals in research.S. F. Sapontzis - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):177-196.
Regan on the lifeboat problem: A defense.Julian H. Franklin - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (2):189-201.
Regan on the Lifeboat Problem: A Defense.Julian H. Franklin - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (2):189-201.
Regan’s Lifeboat Case and the Additive Assumption.Daniel Kary - 2020 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 33 (1):127-143.


Added to PP

51 (#309,002)

6 months
6 (#740,247)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?