Philosophy Compass 8 (3):254-268 (2013)

Authors
Sarah Fine
King's College London
Abstract
Many of us take it for granted that states have a right to control the entry and settlement of non‐citizens in their territories, and hardly pause to consider or evaluate the moral justifications for immigration controls. For a long time, very few political philosophers showed a great deal of interest in the subject. However, it is now attracting much more attention in the discipline. This article aims to show that we most certainly should not take it for granted that states enjoy a moral right to exclude would‐be immigrants. It is neither obvious nor uncontroversial. And if we cannot find adequate justifications for the existence of such a right, then we need to re‐evaluate the very backbone of current approaches to immigration policy. The paper begins with an overview of the existing academic debate about the extent of the right to freedom of movement. Next it introduces three arguments in support of the state’s right to exclude would‐be immigrants which draw on claims about the collective right to self‐determination. Finally it outlines three important challenges faced by these arguments in support of the state’s right to exclude
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phc3.12019
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,018
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.
Immigration: The Case for Limits.David Miller - 2005 - In Andrew I. Cohen & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 193-206.
National Responsibility and Global Justice.David Miller - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (4):383-399.
On Nationality.David Miller - 2001 - Mind 110 (438):512-516.

View all 46 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Ethics of Resisting Immigration Law.Javier Hidalgo - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (12).
Democracy and the Right to Exclusion.Ludvig Beckman - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (4):395-411.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is the Right to Exclude Immigrants?Sune Lægaard - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (3):245-262.
Nationalism and Immigration.Chaim Gans - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (2):159-180.
Territorial Rights, Political Association, and Immigration.Sune Lægaard - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (5):645-670.
Immigration.Sir Michael Dummett - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (2):115-122.
Immigration, Association, and the Family.Matthew Lister - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (6):717-745.
Des Musées Et des Expositions Dans le Débat Sur L’Immigration En France.Marie-Sylvie Poli & Linda Idjéraoui-Ravez - 2011 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 61 (3):, [ p.].

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
422 ( #14,294 of 2,324,073 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #25,279 of 2,324,073 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes