The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus

Oxford: Oxford University Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus Gail Fine. sense that they consider the issues it raises; and they argue, against its conclusion, that inquiry is possible. Like Plato and Aristotle, they also explain what makes inquiry possible; and they do ...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2018

Call number

B187.K7.F56 2014

ISBN(s)

9780198822646   9780199577392   0199577390   0198822642   9780191760969   0191502472

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,377

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Possibility of Inquiry. Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. [REVIEW]Justin Joseph Vlasits - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (3):580-583.
The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus.Luca Castagnoli - 2018 - Philosophical Review 127 (2):225-228.
Review of The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus, by Gail Fine. [REVIEW]David Bronstein - 2017 - Mind 126 (502):631-634.
The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus by Gail Fine. [REVIEW]David Ebrey - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (3):537-538.
The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. By Gail Fine. Pp. xiv, 399, Oxford University Press, 2014, £55.00/$85.00. [REVIEW]Robin Waterfield - 2018 - Heythrop Journal 59 (4):748-749.
Plato's Meno and the Possibility of Inquiry in the Absence of Knowledge.Filip Grgic - 1999 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 4 (1):19-40.
Meno's Paradox in Context.David Ebrey - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):4-24.
Knowing How to Ask: A Discussion of Gail Fine, The Possibility of Inquiry.Raphael Woolf - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49:363-391.
Defending Philosophy: Plato, Heidegger, and Meno’s Paradox.Joshua Livingstone - 2024 - Symposium 28 (1):149-174.
XII-Escaping One's Own Notice Knowing: Meno's Paradox Again.Mary Margaret McCabe - 2009 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3):233-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-17

Downloads
152 (#132,743)

6 months
16 (#255,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gail Fine
Cornell University

Citations of this work

The Knowledge Norm for Inquiry.Christopher Willard-Kyle - 2023 - Journal of Philosophy 120 (11):615-640.
Norms of Inquiry.Eliran Haziza - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (12):e12952.
Ignorance, soundness, and norms of inquiry.Christopher Willard-Kyle - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (6):1477-1485.
The Benefit to Philosophy of the Study of its History.Maria Rosa Antognazza - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1):161-184.
Memory as Triage: Facing Up to the Hard Question of Memory.Nikola Andonovski - 2020 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (2):227-256.

View all 34 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

True Belief in the Meno.Panagiotis Dimas - 1996 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14:1-32.
Inquiry.Nicholas P. White - 1974 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (2):289 - 310.
The Stoics on Definition.Paolo Crivelli - 2010 - In David Charles (ed.), Definition in Greek philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references