Philosophy East and West 61 (1):183-194 (2011)

Bronwyn Finnigan
Australian National University
I begin by warmly thanking Professors Garfield and Hansen for participating in this dialogue. I greatly value the work of both and appreciate having the opportunity to engage in a dialogue with them. Aside from the many important insights I gain from their replies, I believe that both Garfield and Hansen misrepresent my position. In response, I shall clarify the argument contained in my preceding comment, and will consider the objections as they bear on this clarified position.Both Garfield and Hansen characterize the central argument of my comment as presupposing a relatively mainstream Western account of action. They suggest that, with a mainstream Western account in hand, I challenge Classical Chinese and Indo ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/pew.2011.0005
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,992
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Intention.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (1):110.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
90 ( #116,350 of 2,439,431 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,215 of 2,439,431 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes