AbstractThe publication in 1632 of Galileo’s Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican marked a crucial moment in the ‘scientific revolution’ and helped Galileo become the ‘father of modern science’. The Dialogue contains Galileo’s mature synthesis of astronomy, physics, and methodology, and a critical confirmation of Copernicus’s hypothesis of the earth’s motion. However, the book also led Galileo to stand trial with the Inquisition, in what became known as ‘the greatest scandal in Christendom’. In The Routledge Guidebook to Galileo's Dialogue , Maurice A. Finocchiaro introduces and analyzes: the intellectual background and historical context of the Copernican controversy and Inquisition trial; the key arguments and critiques that Galileo presents on both sides of the ‘dialogue’; the Dialogue ’s content and significance from three special points of view: science, methodology, and rhetoric; the enduring legacy of the Dialogue and the ongoing application of its approach to other areas. This is an essential introduction for all students of science, philosophy, history, and religion wanting a useful guide to Galileo’s great classic
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Similar books and articles
Galileo and the Philosophy of Science.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:130 - 139.
Review of Maurice A. Finocchiaro: Defending Copernicus and Galileo: Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs. [REVIEW]Peter Slezak - 2011 - Science & Education 20 (1):71-81.
Methodological Judgment and Critical Reasoning in Galileo's Dialogue.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:248 - 257.
The Louvain Lectures of Bellarmine and the Autograph Copy of His 1616 Declaration to Galileo, And: The Galileo Affair: A Meeting of Faith and Science.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1988 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (1):149-151.
The Character of Galilean Evidence.Joseph C. Pitt - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:125 - 134.
The Paradox of Conceptual Novelty and Galileo’s Use of Experiments.Maarten Van Dyck - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):864-875.
Gassendi's Reintrepretation of the Galilean Theory of Tides.Carla Rita Palmerino - 2004 - Perspectives on Science 12 (2):212-237.
Galileo's Inquisition Trial Revisited. [REVIEW]Maurice Finocchiaro - 2009 - Early Science and Medicine 14 (4):576-578.
Aspects of Aristotelian Statics in Galileo's Dynamics.J. Groot - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):645-664.
And Yet It Moves: The Observability of the Rotation of the Earth. [REVIEW]Peter Kosso - 2010 - Foundations of Science 15 (3):213-225.
The Paradox of Conceptual Novelty and Galileo's Use of Experiments.Maarten Dycvank - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):864-875.