- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What is Einstein's statistical interpretation, or, is it Einstein for whom bell's theorem tolls?
Topoi 3 (1):23-36 (1984)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The interpretation of the Einstein-Rupp experiments and their influence on the history of quantum mechanics.Jeroen van Dongen - 2007 - Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37:121-131.
The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory.Arthur Fine - 1986 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
A loophole in bell's theorem? Parameter dependence in the hess‐philipp model.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1357-1367.
Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the great debate about the nature of reality.Manjit Kumar - 2008 - Gurgaon: Hachette India.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
99 (#171,909)
6 months
8 (#347,798)
2009-01-28
Downloads
99 (#171,909)
6 months
8 (#347,798)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Fine's prism models for quantum correlation statistics.W. D. Sharp & N. Shanks - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (4):538-564.
References found in this work
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen - 1935 - Physical Review (47):777-780.
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables, I and II.David Bohm - 1952 - Physical Review (85):166-193.
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?Niels Bohr - 1935 - Physical Review 48 (696--702):696--702.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo