What might but must not be

Analysis 80 (4):647-656 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We examine an objection to analysing the epistemic ‘might’ and ‘may’ as existential quantifiers over possibilities. Some claims that a proposition “might” be the case appear felicitous although, according to the quantifier analysis, they are necessarily false, since there are no possibilities in which the proposition is true. We explain such cases pragmatically, relying on the fact that ‘might’-sentences are standardly used to convey that the speaker takes a proposition as a serious option in reasoning. Our account explains why it makes sense to utter these sentences despite their being literally false and why their falsity is easily missed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,509

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Trouble with Tarski.Jonathan Harrison - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (190):1-22.
Perspectives on Possibilities: Contextualism, Relativism, or What?Kent Bach - 2009 - In Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press.
The Trouble with Tarski.Jonathan Harrison - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (190):1-22.
Aristotle on Modality: Stephen Makin.Stephen Makin - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):143-161.
Aristotle on Modality, I.Stephen Makin - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):143–161.
Sentence and Truth Value.Chai-Hsun Chuang - 2006 - Philosophy and Culture 33 (6):67-77.
A Study on Proposition and Sentence in English Grammar.Mudasir A. Tantray - 2016 - International Journal Of Humanities and Social Studies 4 (02):20-25.
Aristotle on Modality, I.Stephen Makin & Nicholas Denyer - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):143-161.
Reductive Theories of Modality.Theodore Sider - 2003 - In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 180-208.
Aristotle on Modality, I.Stephen Makin & Nicholas Denyer - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):143-161.
Aristotle on Modality, II.Nicholas Denyer - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):163–178.
What Is It to Be Happy That P?Jeremy Fantl - 2015 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2.
Relative Truth and the First Person.Friederike Moltmann - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (2):187-220..
Sentences and Propositions.Michael Dummett - 2000 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 46:9-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-05

Downloads
73 (#163,442)

6 months
10 (#80,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Stephen Finlay
Australian Catholic University
Benjamin Lennertz
Colgate University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inquiry.Robert C. Stalnaker - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.
Studies in the Way of Words.Paul Grice - 1989 - Philosophy 65 (251):111-113.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
What 'Must' and 'Can' Must and Can Mean.Angelika Kratzer - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):337--355.

View all 31 references / Add more references