What Is a Thing?

Metaphilosophy 50 (5):649-669 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


‘Thing’ in the titular question should be construed as having the utmost generality. In the relevant sense, a thing just is an entity, an existent, a being. The present task is to say what a thing of any category is. This task is, I believe, the primary one of any comprehensive and systematic metaphysics. Indeed, an answer provides the means for resolving perennial disputes concerning the integrity of the structure in reality—whether some of the relations among things are necessary merely given those relata themselves—and the intricacy of this structure—whether some things are more or less fundamental than others. After considering some reasons for thinking the generality of the titular question makes it unanswerable, I propound the methodology, original inquiry, required to answer it. The key to this methodology is adopting a singular perspective; confronting the world as merely the impetus to inquiry, one can attain an account of what a thing must be. Radical ontology is a systematic metaphysics—broadly Aristotelian, essentialist and nonhierarchical—that develops the consequences of this account. With it, it is possible to move past stalemate in metaphysics by revealing the grounds of a principled choice between seemingly incommensurable worldviews.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Is Time?Marcello Oreste Fiocco - 2017 - Manuscrito 40 (1):43-65.
On Doing Ontology Without Metaphysics.Achille C. Varzi - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):407-423.
Thing-Ing and No-Thing in Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi.Qingjie James Wang - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (2):159-174.
Methodology, Ontology, and Interventionism.James Woodward - 2015 - Synthese 192 (11):3577-3599.
Introduction : A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.David Manley - 2009 - In David Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press.
Heidegger and the Project of Fundamental Ontology.Michael Gendre (ed.) - 1991 - State University of New York Press.
Neoplatonic Origins of the Act of Being.David Bradshaw - 1999 - Review of Metaphysics 53 (2):383 - 401.
How is the Arrival of Things Possible?Hua’nan Gong - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):389-408.
Ontology: Unreal Reality.Piotr Jaroszyński - 2014 - Studia Gilsoniana 3:321-334.


Added to PP

317 (#35,872)

6 months
28 (#39,367)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

M. Oreste Fiocco
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

Possibility Precedes Actuality.Tuomas E. Tahko - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-21.
Knowing Things in Themselves.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2017 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 94 (3):332-358.
There is Nothing to Identity.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):7321-7337.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ontological Dependence.Tuomas E. Tahko & E. J. Lowe - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On What Grounds What.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In David Manley, David J. Chalmers & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
Ordinary Objects.Amie L. Thomasson (ed.) - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
By Our Bootstraps.Karen Bennett - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):27-41.

View all 24 references / Add more references