Metaphilosophy 50 (5):649-669 (2019)
Abstract‘Thing’ in the titular question should be construed as having the utmost generality. In the relevant sense, a thing just is an entity, an existent, a being. The present task is to say what a thing of any category is. This task is, I believe, the primary one of any comprehensive and systematic metaphysics. Indeed, an answer provides the means for resolving perennial disputes concerning the integrity of the structure in reality—whether some of the relations among things are necessary merely given those relata themselves—and the intricacy of this structure—whether some things are more or less fundamental than others. After considering some reasons for thinking the generality of the titular question makes it unanswerable, I propound the methodology, original inquiry, required to answer it. The key to this methodology is adopting a singular perspective; confronting the world as merely the impetus to inquiry, one can attain an account of what a thing must be. Radical ontology is a systematic metaphysics—broadly Aristotelian, essentialist and nonhierarchical—that develops the consequences of this account. With it, it is possible to move past stalemate in metaphysics by revealing the grounds of a principled choice between seemingly incommensurable worldviews.
Similar books and articles
Each Thing Is Fundamental: Against Hylomorphism and Hierarchical Structure.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2019 - American Philosophical Quarterly 56 (3):289-301.
On Doing Ontology Without Metaphysics.Achille C. Varzi - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):407-423.
Thing-Ing and No-Thing in Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi.Qingjie James Wang - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (2):159-174.
To the Things Themselves Again: Observations on What Things Are and Why They Matter.James Gordon Finlayson - 2013 - In Paul Graves-Brown, Rodney Harrison & Angela Piccini (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Contemporary World. Oxford University Press.
Foundations for Descartes' Metaphysics of the Self.Bruce Michael Thomas - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Introduction : A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics.David Manley - 2009 - In David Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press.
Heidegger and the Project of Fundamental Ontology.Michael Gendre (ed.) - 1991 - State University of New York Press.
Stanowisko Eduarda von Hartmanna wobec pojęcia rzeczy samej w sobie Immanuela Kanta.Marcin Furman - 2012 - Filo-Sofija 12 (18).
Neoplatonic Origins of the Act of Being.David Bradshaw - 1999 - Review of Metaphysics 53 (2):383 - 401.
How is the Arrival of Things Possible?Hua’nan Gong - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):389-408.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Knowing Things in Themselves.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2017 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 94 (3):332-358.
References found in this work
On What Grounds What.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In David Manley, David J. Chalmers & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.