Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):193-209 (2012)
This essay replies to four critics of In Defense of Kant’s Religion (IDKR). In reply to Gordon E. Michalson, Jr., I argue that the best pathway for understanding Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason (Religion) is to conduct close textual analysis rather than giving up the art of interpretation or allowing meta-considerations surrounding Kant’s personal and political circumstances to govern one’s interpretation. In response to George di Giovanni, I contend that his critique is dismissive of theologically robust readings of Kant for reasons that have very little to do with what Religion actually asserts. Pamela Sue Anderson’s essay, I argue, reads Kant on God according to an empirically-biased stream of British interpretation which makes Kant’s transcendental philosophy appear foreign to its rationalist heritage. Lastly, in response to Stephen R. Palmquist, I suggest that his reading of Kant’s two experiments is done not only in a vacuum, but also according to a perspectival interpretation of Kant that goes beyond what Kant’s writings actually maintain.
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Reply to Critics of In Defense of Kant's Religion.Nathan A. Jacobs - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):210-228.
The Philosophical Significance of Kant's Religion.Pamela Sue Anderson - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):151-162.
On Chris L. Firestone and Nathan Jacobs's In Defense of Kant's Religion.George di Giovanni - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):163-169.
Cross-Examination of In Defense of Kant's Religion.Stephen R. Palmquist - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):170-180.
In Defense of Not Defending Kant's Religion.Gordon E. Michalson - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):181-192.
The Implied Standpoint of Kant's Religion_: An Assessment of Kant's Reply to an Early Book Review of _Religion Within the Bounds of Bare Reason. [REVIEW]Stephen R. Palmquist & Otterman - 2013 - Kantian Review 18 (1):73-97.
Triangulating God: A Kantian Rejoinder to Perovich.Stephen Palmquist - 1994 - Faith and Philosophy 11 (2):302-310.
Rational Faith: God, Immortality, Grace.Patrick Frierson - 2011 - In Immanuel Kant: Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing.
Introduction: On Defending Kant at the AAR.Andrew Chignell - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):144-150.
Causal Powers, Hume's Early German Critics, and Kant's Response to Hume.Brian A. Chance - 2013 - Kant-Studien 104 (2):213-236.
Kant's Transcendental Religious Argument: The Possibility of Religion.Dennis Schulting - 2013 - In Stefano Bacin & Claudio La Rocca (eds.), Akten des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010. de Gruyter. pp. 949-962.
The Devil, The Virgin, and the Envoy: Symbols of Moral Struggle in Religion II.2.Andrew Chignell - 2010 - In Otfried Hoeffe (ed.), Klassiker Auslegen: Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen. Akademie Verlag.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads16 ( #299,388 of 2,171,974 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,676 of 2,171,974 )
How can I increase my downloads?