Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):193-209 (2012)

Authors
Abstract
This essay replies to four critics of In Defense of Kant’s Religion. In reply to Gordon E. Michalson, Jr., I argue that the best pathway for understandingKant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason is to conduct close textual analysis rather than giving up the art of interpretation or allowing meta-considerations surrounding Kant’s personal and political circumstances to govern one’s interpretation. In response to George di Giovanni, I contend that his critique is dismissive of theologically robust readings of Kant for reasons that have very little to do with what Religion actually asserts. Pamela Sue Anderson’s essay, I argue, reads Kant on God according to an empirically-biased stream of British interpretation which makes Kant’s transcendental philosophy appear foreign to its rationalist heritage. Lastly, in response to Stephen R. Palmquist, I suggest that his reading of Kant’s two experiments is done not only in a vacuum, but also according to a perspectival interpretation of Kant that goes beyond what Kant’s writings actually maintain.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI faithphil201229219
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Belief in Kant.Andrew Chignell - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (3):323-360.
Who Is the True Kant?Keith E. Yandell - 2007 - Philosophia Christi 9 (1):81-97.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In Defense of Not Defending Kant’s Religion.Gordon E. Michalson Jr - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):181-192.
In Defense of Not Defending Kant’s Religion.Gordon E. Michalson - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):181-192.
Immanuel Kant: A Christian Philosopher?Stephen Palmquist - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):65-75.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-09-18

Total views
45 ( #251,260 of 2,505,216 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,216 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes