Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2):286-306 (2003)
It is often thought that if a developing human being is considered a “person” from the beginning, then it would follow that abortion would be impermissible. For, after all, a person has a stringent right to life, and because life is a prerequisite for enjoying any other goods, it is plausible that the right to life is a “basic” or “fundamental” one, not easily overridden by other considerations. The right to life, it would seem, could not be outweighed by another individual's preferences, even preferences about what should happen in or to her body
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Alfred R. Mele, Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), Viii + 271 Pp. [REVIEW]John Martin Fischer - 1999 - Noûs 33 (1):133-143.
Autonomy Within Subservient Careers.James Rocha - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):313-328.
Can Technology Fix the Abortion Problem?Patrick D. Hopkins - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):311-326.
Autonomy, Self-Control and Weakness of Will.Alfred R. Mele - 2002 - In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook on Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Abortion, Society, and the Law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Bridging the Divide: The Role of Perceived Control in Mediating Reasoning and Activism.Philip G. Laird - 2003 - Journal of Moral Education 32 (1):35-49.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads71 ( #71,813 of 2,152,647 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #105,084 of 2,152,647 )
How can I increase my downloads?