Can Science Test Supernatural Worldviews?

Science & Education 18 (6-7):813-837 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11191-007-9108-4

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Is a Science of the Supernatural Possible?Evan Fales - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 247.
Science, Worldviews and Education.Michael R. Matthews - 2014 - In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 1585-1635.
What Science Can and Cannot Say: The Problems with Methodological Naturalism.Reed Richter - 2002 - Reports of the National Center for Science Education 22 (Jan-Apr 2002):18-22.
Paraconsistency and its relation to worldviews.Diderik Batens - 1998 - Foundations of Science 3 (2):259-283.
Balderdash and chicanery: Science and beyond.Andrew Aberdein - 2003 - In James South (ed.), Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Philosophy: Fear and Trembling in Sunnydale. Open Court. pp. 79-90.
Worldviews and Intercultural Philosophy.Richard Evanoff - 2016 - Dialogue and Universalism 26 (4):119-132.
Worldviews: a Christian response to religious pluralism.Anthony J. Steinbronn - 2007 - St. Louis, MO: Concordia Pub. House.
Naturalism, science and the supernatural.Steve Clarke - 2009 - Sophia 48 (2):127-142.
The motivational underpinnings of religion.Mark Jordan Landau, Jeff Greenberg & Sheldon Solomon - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):743-744.
Supernaturalism is Unwittingly Naturalistic.Earl Stanley B. Fronda - 2015 - International Philosophical Quarterly 55 (3):363-382.
Miracles and scientific explanation.Margaret A. Boden - 1969 - Ratio (Misc.) 11:137 - 144.
Overview of the structure of a scientific worldview.John J. Carvalho - 2006 - Zygon 41 (1):113-124.
Book Review: The Customization of Science: The Impact of Religious and Political Worldviews on Contemporary Science, by Steve Fuller, Mikael Stenmark, and Ulf Zackarisson, eds.FullerSteveStenmarkMikaelZackarissonUlf eds. The Customization of Science: The Impact of Religious and Political Worldviews on Contemporary Science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. xii + 209 pp. $95.00 . ISBN-9781137379603. [REVIEW]Sheldon Richmond - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (1):92-97.
The supernatural guilt trip does not take us far enough.L. Gjersoe Nathalia & M. Hood Bruce - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):473-474.
Worldviews: An Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Science.Richard DeWitt - 2004 - Wiley-Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-15

Downloads
35 (#445,257)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Epistemological scientism and the scientific meta-method.Petri Turunen, Ilmari Hirvonen & Ilkka Pättiniemi - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (2):1-23.
The Role of Metaphysical Naturalism in Science.Martin Mahner - 2012 - Science & Education 21 (10):1437–1459.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.

View all 51 references / Add more references