Dennett on the basic argument

Metaphilosophy 36 (4):427-435 (2005)
Authors
John Fischer
University of California, Riverside
Abstract
Christopher Taylor has greatly clarified my thinking on this topic and shown me how to launch a deeper and more radical campaign in support of my earlier claims to this effect, and our coauthored paper (Taylor and Dennett 2001) provides more technical detail than is needed here. Here I will attempt a gentler version of our argument, highlighting the main points so that non-philosophers can at least see what the points of contention are, and how we propose to settle them, while leaving out almost all the logical formulae. Philosophers should consult the full-dress version, of course, to see if we have actually tied off the loose ends, and closed the loopholes that are passed by without mention in this telling. (Dennett
Keywords Compatibilism  Determinism  Free Will  Freedom  Metaphysics  Dennett, Daniel
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00381.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,066
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Action.Carl Ginet - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
An Essay on Free Will.Peter Van Inwagen - 1983 - Oxford University Press.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Semicompatibilism and Its Rivals.John Martin Fischer - 2012 - The Journal of Ethics 16 (2):117-143.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
107 ( #54,759 of 2,241,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #113,097 of 2,241,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature