Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (4):375-378 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/431039

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,053

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

"Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies": Stanley Fish. [REVIEW]Michael Benton - 1990 - British Journal of Aesthetics 30 (4):386.
Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (review).Ronald Bogue - 1990 - Philosophy and Literature 14 (2):435-436.
Fish Shticks: Rhetorical Questions in Stanley Fish's Doing What Comes NaturallyDoing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. [REVIEW]John Michael & Stanley Fish - 1990 - Diacritics 20 (2):54.
The New Party of Order? Coalition Politics in the AcademyDoing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and Theory in Literary and Legal Studies"Us and Them: On the Philosophical Bases of Political Criticism"Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. [REVIEW]Madhava Prasad, Stanley Fish, S. P. Mohanty & Barbara Herrnstein Smith - 1992 - Diacritics 22 (1):34.
“What am I doing?” Stanley fish on the possibility of legal theory.Michael Robertson - 2002 - Legal Theory 8 (3):359-385.
Stanley Fish and the Old Quarrel between Rhetoric and Philosophy.David Roochnik - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (2):225-246.
Swimming upstream with Stanley fish.Kathleen Mccormick - 1985 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 44 (1):67-76.
Doing what comes naturally, or a walk on the wild side?: Remarks on Stanley Fish’s anti-foundationalist concept of law, its closure and force.Jiri Priban - 1998 - Law and Critique 9 (2):249-270.
The essential rhetoric of law, literature, and liberty.Donald N. McCloskey - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (2):203-223.
Postmodern Sophistry: Stanley Fish and the Critical Enterprise.Gary A. Olson & Lynn Worsham - 2004 - SUNY Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
72 (#281,835)

6 months
10 (#357,986)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On Law as Poetry: Shelley and Tocqueville.Joshua M. Hall - forthcoming - South African Journal of Philosophy 3 (40).
The Derivational Theory of Legal Interpretation in Polish Legal Theory.Olgierd Bogucki - 2020 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 33 (3):617-636.
Bioethics in pluralistic societies.Leigh Turner - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (2):201-208.

View all 60 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references