Effects of differential instructions and number of acquisition trials on extinction and reacquisition of the conditioned-eyelid response
Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):126 (1967)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1037/h0024897
My notes
Similar books and articles
Age differences in the acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyelid response.Harry W. Braun & Richard Geiselhart - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (6):386.
Effect of number of acquisition trials and the presence or absence of the UCS on extinction of the eyelid CR.Kenenth W. Spence, Edward F. Rutledge & John H. Talbott - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (3):286.
Effects of differential instructions, differential payoffs, and the presence or absence of feedback on the percentage, latency, and amplitude of the conditioned eyelid response.Harold D. Fishbein & I. Gormezano - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):535.
Supplementary report: Effects of instructions on extinction and recovery of a conditioned avoidance response.K. E. Moyer & Richard H. Lindley - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):95.
Effects of instructions on the extinction of a conditioned finger-withdrawal response.Richard H. Lindley & K. E. Moyer - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (1):82.
Supplementary report: Resistance to extinction of a verbal response as a function of the number of acquisition trials.Monte G. Senko, Ronald A. Champ & E. J. Capaldi - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):350.
Effects of differential instructions, differential feedback, and ucs intensity on the conditioned-eyelid response.Harold D. Fishbein - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):56.
Durability of persistence as a function of number of partially reinforced trials.Kenneth L. Traupmann, Paul T. Wong & Abram Amsel - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (3):372.
Extinction of trace conditioned responses as a function of the spacing of trials during the acquisition and extinction series.B. Reynolds - 1945 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 35 (2):81.
Effects of ready signal condition on acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyelid response.Louis E. Price, William E. Vandament & David W. Abbott - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):516.
Differential Resistance to Extinction Determined by a Small Number of Differential Instrumental Conditioning Trials.James R. Ison & Allen A. Adinolfi - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):350.
Self-punitive behavior: Effects of number of massed acquisition trials and percentage of goal-shocked extinction trials.Michael D. Matthews & Harold Babb - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (6):475-478.
Resistance to extinction and the pattern of reinforcement: II. Effect of successive alternation of blocks of reinforced and unreinforced trials upon the conditioned eyelid response to light.Harold W. Hake & David A. Grant - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (3):216.
Resistance to extinction as a function of percentage of reinforcement, number of training trials, and conditioned reinforcement.Norman Kass & Helen Wilson - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):355.
Effects of CS and UCS change on extinction of the conditioned eyelid response.Louis E. Price, David W. Abbott & William E. Vandament - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):437.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
15 (#701,246)
6 months
1 (#455,921)
2013-11-22
Downloads
15 (#701,246)
6 months
1 (#455,921)
Historical graph of downloads