Is it worth it? Lintott and ethically evaluating environmental art

Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):279 – 286 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question ‘Is it worth it?’, as originally applied to artworks by Tolstoy and here reintroduced by Sheila Lintott, opens a fruitful avenue for understanding land art. It is, however, a question...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
28 (#538,947)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Interaction of Ethics and Aesthetics in Environmental Art.Ted Nannicelli - 2018 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (4):497-506.
Aesthetic regard for nature in environmental and land art.Emily Brady - 2007 - Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):287 – 300.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Categories of Art.Kendall L. Walton - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.
The transfiguration of the commonplace.Arthur C. Danto - 1974 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (2):139-148.
The Transfiguration of the Commonplace.Warren Quinn & Arthur C. Danto - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (3):481.
Moderate Moralism.Noël Carroll - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3):223-238.

View all 17 references / Add more references