Mind and Language 35 (4):415-439 (2020)

Authors
Eugen Fischer
University of East Anglia
Abstract
Many philosophical thought experiments and arguments involve unusual cases. We present empirical reasons to doubt the reliability of intuitive judgments and conclusions about such cases. Inferences and intuitions prompted by verbal case descriptions are influenced by routine comprehension processes which invoke stereotypes. We build on psycholinguistic findings to determine conditions under which the stereotype associated with the most salient sense of a word predictably supports inappropriate inferences from descriptions of unusual (stereotype-divergent) cases. We conduct an experiment that combines plausibility ratings with pupillometry to document this “salience bias.” We find that under certain conditions, competent speakers automatically make stereotypical inferences they know to be inappropriate.
Keywords comprehension inferences  non‐contextual salience  philosophical intuitions  philosophical method  pupillometry  stereotypes
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/mila.12249
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology.Jennifer Nagel - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (3):495-527.
The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions.Kenneth Boyd & Jennifer Nagel - 2014 - In Edouard Machery & O'Neill Elizabeth (eds.), Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 109-127.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No hope for the Irrelevance Claim.Miguel Egler - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (11):3351-3371.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anti-Intellectualism, Egocentrism and Bank Case Intuitions.Alexander Dinges - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (11):2841-2857.
The Philosophical Personality Argument.Adam Feltz & Edward T. Cokely - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (2):227-246.
Frontal Eye Field: A Cortical Salience Map.Kirk G. Thompson & Narcisse P. Bichot - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):699-700.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-03-11

Total views
486 ( #15,918 of 2,449,145 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #12,370 of 2,449,145 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes