Procedural misconceptions and informed consent: Insights from empirical research on the clinical trials industry
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (3):251-268 (2006)
Abstract
: This paper provides a simultaneously reflexive and analytical framework to think about obstacles to truly informed consent in social science and biomedical research. To do so, it argues that informed consent often goes awry due to procedural misconceptions built into the research context. The concept of procedural misconception is introduced to describe how individuals respond to what is familiar in research settings and overlook what is different. In the context of biomedical research, procedural misconceptions can be seen to function as root causes of therapeutic misconceptionsDOI
10.1353/ken.2006.0018
My notes
Similar books and articles
Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research.James R. P. Ogloff & Randy K. Otto - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (4):239 – 252.
The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine.Oonagh Corrigan (ed.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Research without consent: Exception from and waiver of informed consent in resuscitation research.Michelle H. Biros - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):361-369.
Informed consent procedure for clinical trials in emergency settings: The polish perspective.Piotr S. Iwanowski - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):333-336.
Medical Risk and the Right to an Informed Consent in Clinical Care and Clinical Research.Dennis John Mazur - 1998 - American College of Physician Executives.
The normative status of the requirement to gain an informed consent in clinical trials : Comprehension, obligations, and empirical evidence.Angus Dawson - 2008 - In Oonagh Corrigan (ed.), The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Must research participants understand randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice.Deborah Bowman - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Informed consent and the use of placebo in Poland: Ethical and legal aspects.Piotr Zaborowski & Adam Górski - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):167-178.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
45 (#262,150)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2009-01-28
Downloads
45 (#262,150)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust.Inmaculada de Melo-Martin & A. Ho - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):202-205.
Epistemic Humility and Medical Practice: Translating Epistemic Categories into Ethical Obligations.A. Schwab - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):28-48.
Picking and Choosing Among Phase I Trials: A Qualitative Examination of How Healthy Volunteers Understand Study Risks.Jill A. Fisher, Torin Monahan & Rebecca L. Walker - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (4):535-549.
Picking and Choosing Among Phase I Trials: A Qualitative Examination of How Healthy Volunteers Understand Study Risks.Jill A. Fisher, Torin Monahan & Rebecca L. Walker - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (4):535-549.
Picking and Choosing Among Phase I Trials: A Qualitative Examination of How Healthy Volunteers Understand Study Risks.Jill A. Fisher, Torin Monahan & Rebecca L. Walker - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (4):535-549.
References found in this work
[Petri Marci Interpretatio in Officia Ciceronis].Marcus Tullius Cicero, Petrus Marcus & Guillaume Le Roy - 1485 - [Guillaume le Roy].
“There is no evidence to suggest …”: Changing The Way We Judge Information For Disclosure in the Informed Consent Process.Leslie Cannold - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (2):165 - 184.