Philosophical Investigations 11 (October):279-99 (1988)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Competence  Mental States  Metaphysics  Understanding  Searle, J
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9205.1988.tb00442.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument?Stevan Harnad - 2001 - In Michael A. Bishop & John M. Preston (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Oxford University Press.
The Chinese Room Argument: Consciousness and Understanding.Simone Gozzano - 1997 - In Matjaz Gams, M. Paprzycki & X. Wu (eds.), Mind Versus Computer: Were Dreyfus and Winograd Right? Amsterdam: IOS Press. pp. 43--231.
Machine Understanding and the Chinese Room.Natika Newton - 1989 - Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):207-15.
I. It Ain't the Meat, It's the Motion.Richard Sharvy - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):125 – 131.
The Chinese Room is a Trick.Peter Kugel - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):153-154.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
39 ( #273,830 of 2,444,835 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,287 of 2,444,835 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes