Authors
Abstract
Contrary to Laurel Gleason's assertions, Deliberative Polling among random samples is not a process that is dominated by “experts” or by certain categories of deliberator; it produces genuine gains among the participants in knowledge of information that has been verified as true and relevant; it does not cause ideological polarization; and it is not intended as a substitute for, rather than a supplement to, deliberation on the part of the general public.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/08913811.2011.635873
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,999
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Deliberative Polling? Reply to Gleason.James S. Fishkin - 2011 - Critical Review 23 (3):393-403.
Deliberation's Legitimation Crisis: Reply To Gleason.Michael Neblo - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (3):405-419.
Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable.Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij - 2012 - Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (3):199-220.
Rhetoric and the Public Sphere.Simone Chambers - 2009 - Political Theory 37 (3):323-350.
The Micro–Macro Link in Deliberative Polling: Science or Politics?Espen D. H. Olsen & Hans-Jörg Trenz - 2016 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (6):662-679.
The State of Democratic Theory: A Reply to James Fishkin.Ian Shapiro - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):79-83.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-20

Total views
2 ( #1,372,179 of 2,410,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,644 of 2,410,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes