Animal morality: What is the debate about?

Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):1151-1183 (2017)
Authors
Simon Fitzpatrick
John Carroll University
Abstract
Empirical studies of the social lives of non-human primates, cetaceans, and other social animals have prompted scientists and philosophers to debate the question of whether morality and moral cognition exists in non-human animals. Some researchers have argued that morality does exist in several animal species, others that these species may possess various evolutionary building blocks or precursors to morality, but not quite the genuine article, while some have argued that nothing remotely resembling morality can be found in any non-human species. However, these different positions on animal morality generally appear to be motivated more by different conceptions of how the term “morality” is to be defined than by empirical disagreements about animal social behaviour and psychology. After delving deeper into the goals and methodologies of various of the protagonists, I argue that, despite appearances, there are actually two importantly distinct debates over animal morality going on, corresponding to two quite different ways of thinking about what it is to define “morality”, “moral cognition”, and associated notions. Several apparent skirmishes in the literature are thus cases of researchers simply talking past each other. I then focus on what I take to be the core debate over animal morality, which is concerned with understanding the nature and phylogenetic distribution of morality conceived as a psychological natural kind. I argue that this debate is in fact largely terminological and non-substantive. Finally, I reflect on how this core debate might best be re-framed.
Keywords Animal cognition  Moral psychology  Evolution of morality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-017-9599-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

The Sources of Normativity.Christine Korsgaard - 1996 - Mind 106 (424):791-794.
Natural Kindness.Matthew Slater - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):375-411.
Special Sciences.Jerry A. Fodor - 1974 - Synthese 28 (2):97-115.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moralność naukowców eksperymentujących na zwierzętach.Andrzej Elżanowski - 2015 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 94 (2):287-299, 470-471.
Liberal Morality and Socialist Morality.W. B. Gallie - 1949 - Philosophy 24 (91):318 - 334.
Morality and Religion: A Psychological Perspective.Anca Mustea, Oana Negru & Adrian Opre - 2010 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 9 (26):18-35.
Learning Ethics From Our Relationships with Animals: Moral Imagination.Maurice Hamington - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):177-188.
Learning Ethics From Our Relationships with Animals.Maurice Hamington - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):177-188.
Morality, Adapted.Benjamin Alan Sachs - 2010 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4):624-629.
Beastly Morality: Animals as Ethical Agents.Jonathan K. Crane (ed.) - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
“Reflections on The Evolution Of Morality”.Christine Korsgaard - 2010 - The Amherst Lecture in Philosophy 5:1-29.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-09

Total downloads
342 ( #12,078 of 2,293,925 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
129 ( #2,261 of 2,293,925 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature