A Rejoinder to Strevens

Abstract
By and large, we think Strevens’s [6] is a useful reply to our original critique [2] of his paper on the Quine–Duhem (QD) problem [5]. But, we remain unsatisfied with several aspects of his reply (and his original paper). Ultimately, we do not think he properly addresses our most important worries. In this brief rejoinder, we explain our remaining worries, and we issue a revised challenge for Strevens’s approach to QD.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,636
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Bayesian Confirmation and Auxiliary Hypotheses Revisited: A Reply to Strevens.Branden Fitelson & Andrew Waterman - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):293-302.
The Bayesian Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses: Reply to Fitelson and Waterman.Michael Strevens - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):913-918.
Quantum Mechanics and Frequentism: A Reply to Ismael.M. Strevens - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):575-577.
Ii. Rejoinder to Gray and Wolfe.Louis Pascal - 1980 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):242 – 251.
How Not to Defend Constructive Empiricism: A Rejoinder.Stathis Psillos - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (188):369-372.
Seeking Depth in Science.S. Perovic - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (4):561-572.
Explanation, Idealisation and the Goldilocks Problem. [REVIEW]Brian Weatherson - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2):461-473.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-22

Total downloads

20 ( #247,283 of 2,169,111 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,850 of 2,169,111 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums