Studies in Philosophy and Education 26 (1):1-11 (2007)
Abstract |
Fundamental differences between current and past knowledge in the field of biotechnology mean that we now have at our disposal the means to irreversibly change what is meant by ‘human nature’. This paper explores some of the ethical issues that accompany the attempt to increase scientific control over the human genetic code in what amounts to a diminishing of difference and the reduction of human life to scientific explanations at the expense of spiritual, cultural and communal considerations. Within such a limited view, the critical role of education is reduced in favour of promoting psychological efficiency, with the possibility of accelerating learning and increasing intellectual capacity through genetic manipulation. A major concern expressed in the paper is the fine line between corrective therapy and psychological enhancement: Who should be defining the normal range of human difference? And what degree of caution should be required in redesigning future generations? The unknown dangers inherent in the application of genetic technology to human life suggests that current precautions may not go far enough in recognising that education is a contestable field.
|
Keywords | Bioethics Biotechnology Subjectivity Genetic modification Identity |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11217-006-9011-5 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice.Allen Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels & Daniel Wikler - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children.Julian Savulescu - 2001 - Bioethics 15 (5-6):413-426.
View all 12 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Ethics of Agri-Food Biotechnology : How Can an Agricultural Technology Be so Important?Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Impact of Education on the Attitudes of College Students Toward Biotechnology.L. G. Sterling, C. K. Halbrendt & S. L. Kitto - 1993 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (1):75-88.
What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?Lawrence Busch & John R. Lloyd - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Life, Death, Genes, and Ethics: Biotechnology and Bioethics.Maxwell John Charlesworth - 1989 - Abc Enterprises for the Australian Broadcasting.
The Three Teachings of Biotechnology.Mickey Gjerris - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Agricultural Biotechnology and the Future Benefits Argument.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.
Ethics in the Biotechnology Century : The South and Southeast Asian Response, Indonesia.Indrawati Gandjar & Noviar Andayani - 2002 - In Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed (ed.), Bioethics: Ethics in the Biotechnology Century. Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia.
Ethics in the Biotechnology Century : The South and Southeast Asian Response, Bangladesh.Hasna Begum - 2002 - In Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed (ed.), Bioethics: Ethics in the Biotechnology Century. Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia.
What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos.Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.) - 2008 - Elsevier/Academic Press.
Ethics in the Biotechnology Century.Dato' Seri Law Hieng Ding - 2002 - In Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed (ed.), Bioethics: Ethics in the Biotechnology Century. Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia.
The Ideal of Nature: Debates About Biotechnology and the Environment.Gregory E. Kaebnick (ed.) - 2011 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
A Framework for Translating Biotechnology Experiences to Nanotechnology.David Sparling - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Biotechnology, Nanotechnology, Media, and Public Opinion.Susanna Priest - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Biotechnology is Compatible with Sustainable Agriculture.Donald Duvick - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):112-125.
How Not to Interpret the Advances of Biotechnology.Giridhari L. Pandit - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (1):93-102.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-08-28
Total views
27 ( #423,061 of 2,506,174 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,174 )
2012-08-28
Total views
27 ( #423,061 of 2,506,174 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,174 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads