Evidence of evidence is not (necessarily) evidence

Analysis 72 (1):85-88 (2012)
Abstract
In this note, I consider various precisifications of the slogan ‘evidence of evidence is evidence’. I provide counter-examples to each of these precisifications (assuming an epistemic probabilistic relevance notion of ‘evidential support’)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/anr126
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,317
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Evidence of Evidence is Evidence.Juan Comesaña & Eyal Tal - 2015 - Analysis 75 (4):557-559.
When Expert Disagreement Supports the Consensus.Finnur Dellsén - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (1):142-156.
This Paper Surely Contains Some Errors.Brian Kim - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):1013-1029.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2011-03-06

Total downloads
353 ( #9,491 of 2,223,727 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #20,886 of 2,223,727 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature