Evidence of evidence is not (necessarily) evidence

Analysis 72 (1):85-88 (2012)
Authors
Branden Fitelson
Northeastern University
Abstract
In this note, I consider various precisifications of the slogan ‘evidence of evidence is evidence’. I provide counter-examples to each of these precisifications (assuming an epistemic probabilistic relevance notion of ‘evidential support’)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/anr126
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,777
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Evidence of Evidence is Evidence.Juan Comesaña & Eyal Tal - 2015 - Analysis 75 (4):557-559.
This Paper Surely Contains Some Errors.Brian Kim - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):1013-1029.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-03-06

Total downloads
370 ( #9,706 of 2,263,247 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #14,141 of 2,263,247 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature