Names and the 'de re — de dicto' distinction

Philosophical Studies 39 (1):25 - 34 (1981)

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
87 (#137,017)

6 months
1 (#388,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Stich againstde dicto‐de reambiguity.Dale Jacquette - 1989 - Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):223-230.
Frege’s Distinction Between Sense and Reference.Gideon Makin - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (2):147-163.
Singular Propositions, Abstract Constituents, and Propositional Attitudes.Edward N. Zalta - 1989 - In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 455--78.
The "De Dicto/De Re" Distinction in Relation to Actions.Martin Bell - 1983 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83:159 - 173.
Are Desires de Dicto Fetishistic?Jonas Olson - 2002 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):89 – 96.
Names and the de Re/de Dicto Distinction.James D. Carney - 1983 - Philosophia 12 (3-4):357-361.

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Thoughts and Their Ascription.Michael Devitt - 1984 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9 (1):385-420.
The Epistemological Argument Against Descriptivism.Robin Jeshion - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):325 - 345.
Essentialist arguments against descriptivism.Michael McGlone - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (4):443-462.

Add more citations