Pollock on probability in epistemology [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 148 (3):455 - 465 (2010)
Abstract
In Thinking and Acting John Pollock offers some criticisms of Bayesian epistemology, and he defends an alternative understanding of the role of probability in epistemology. Here, I defend the Bayesian against some of Pollock's criticisms, and I discuss a potential problem for Pollock's alternative account
Keywords Pollock  Probability  Logic  Bayesian  Epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-009-9492-5
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,590
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
On Conditionals.Dorothy Edgington - 1995 - Mind 104 (414):235-329.
Ifs and Oughts.Niko Kolodny & John MacFarlane - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (3):115-143.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Contradictory Information: Too Much of a Good Thing. [REVIEW]J. Michael Dunn - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):425 - 452.
Truth in Evidence and Truth in Arguments Without Logical Omniscience.Gregor Betz - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4):1117-1137.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-07-04

Total downloads

109 ( #45,450 of 2,168,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #61,314 of 2,168,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums