Pollock on probability in epistemology [Book Review]
Philosophical Studies 148 (3):455 - 465 (2010)
In Thinking and Acting John Pollock offers some criticisms of Bayesian epistemology, and he defends an alternative understanding of the role of probability in epistemology. Here, I defend the Bayesian against some of Pollock's criticisms, and I discuss a potential problem for Pollock's alternative account
|Keywords||Pollock Probability Logic Bayesian Epistemology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Logic of Conditionals: An Application of Probability to Deductive Logic.Ernest W. Adams - 1975 - D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Citations of this work BETA
Contradictory Information: Too Much of a Good Thing. [REVIEW]J. Michael Dunn - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):425 - 452.
Similar books and articles
Evidential Probability and Objective Bayesian Epistemology.Gregory Wheeler & Jon Williamson - 2011 - In Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Malcolm Forster (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Statistics. Elsevier.
Desire and Pleasure in John Pollock's Thinking About Acting. [REVIEW]Timothy Schroeder - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (3):447–454.
Bayesian Epistemology.Stephan Hartmann & Jan Sprenger - forthcoming - In Duncan Pritchard & Sven Bernecker (eds.), Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge.
A Brief Comparison of Pollock's Defeasible Reasoning and Ranking Functions.Wolfgang Spohn - 2002 - Synthese 131 (1):39-56.
Nomic Probability and the Foundations of Induction.John L. Pollock - 1990 - Oxford University Press.
Abstract of Comments: Pollock on Epistemology and Probability.John A. Barker - 1983 - Noûs 17 (1):68 - 69.
Added to index2009-07-04
Total downloads107 ( #44,828 of 2,152,238 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #89,723 of 2,152,238 )
How can I increase my downloads?