Vivarium 44 (s 2-3):305-337 (2006)

Ph. D. Fitzgerald, Ph. D.
Rutgers University - New Brunswick (PhD)
The essay develops two major arguments. First, if John Buridan's 'first argument' for the reintroduction of natural supposition is only that the "eternal truth" of a scientific proposition is preserved because subject terms in scientific propositions supposit for all the term's past, present, and future significata indifferently; then Albert of Saxony thinks it is simply ineffective. Only the 'second argument', i.e. the argument for the existence of an 'atemporal copula', adequately performs this task; but is rejected by Albert. Second, later fourteenth-century criticisms of Buridan's natural supposition, given in certain Notabilia from the anonymous author in, Paris, BnF, lat. 14.716, ff. 40va-41rb, are nothing but an interpolated hodge-podge of criticisms given earlier in the century against various views of Buridan's by Albert of Saxony. It is this fact that makes Albert the real source of late fourteenth-century criticisms of Buridan's view of natural supposition.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156853406779159455
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,577
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Albert of Saxony.Joél Biard - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aristotle, Arabic.Marc Geoffroy - 2011 - In H. Lagerlund (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer. pp. 105--116.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #187,828 of 2,533,610 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,998 of 2,533,610 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes