Recent work on ethical realism

Analysis 69 (4):746-760 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Introduction: characterizing ethical realismIt is useful to begin a survey of recent work on ethical realism with a look at current disputes over what makes a theory of ethics count as ‘realist’ in the first place. Nearly all characterizations of ethical realism include some version of the following two core claims: Ethical discourse is assertoric and descriptive: ethical claims purport to state ethical facts by attributing ethical properties to people, actions, institutions, etc., and are thus true or false depending on whether their descriptions of things are accurate or not . 1 At least some ethical claims, when literally construed, are true in the above sense.Sayre-McCord maintains that these two conditions are necessary and sufficient to characterize ethical realism; others argue that further conditions must be added to yield ethical realism, or at least ‘paradigmatic’ or ‘robust’ ethical realism. Before turning to that, however, it is worth noting that some have recently denied that the above two conditions are even necessary for ethical realism. In probing new work on metaethical taxonomy, Miller argues that the core of ethical realism is simply the metaphysical commitment to objective ethical properties and facts, which is strictly independent of the semantic claims above. If one holds that there are objective facts about the wrongness of slavery, for example, then one ought to count as an ethical realist regardless of whatever views one might hold about the semantics of the contingent forms of discourse that have evolved among language users. Even if our ethical discourse turns out primarily to express conative states ), or all moral claims turn out to be false because …

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Recent debates over structural realism.Daniel McArthur - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):209 - 224.
Realism and anti-realism in Kant's second critique.Patrick Kain - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (5):449–465.
Environ-Moral Realism.John Mizzoni - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:191-221.
Moral realism and teleosemantics.Richard Joyce - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):723-31.
Kantian value realism.Alison Hills - 2008 - Ratio 21 (2):182–200.
Realism, Reflexivity, Conflation, and Individualism.Mark Carrigan - 2010 - Journal of Critical Realism 9 (3):384-396.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-09-23

Downloads
317 (#61,366)

6 months
14 (#168,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William FitzPatrick
University of Rochester

References found in this work

The moral problem.Michael Smith - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
The sources of normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
Moral realism: a defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 69 references / Add more references