Solutions to Some Open Problems from Slaney

Australasian Journal of Logic 13 (4) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In response to a paper by Harris & Fitelson, Slaney states several open questions concerning possible strategies for proving distributivity in a wide class of positive sentential logics. In this note, I provide answers to all of Slaney's open questions. The result is a better understanding of the class of positive logics in which distributivity holds.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Semipositive LTL with an Uninterpreted Past Operator.John Slaney - 2005 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 13 (2):211-229.
A better philosophy for a better psychology: Comment on Slaney and Racine (2011).Edouard Machery - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (2):90-95.
Reduced models for relevant logics without ${\rm WI}$.John K. Slaney - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (3):395-407.
Four Variables Suffice.Alasdair Urquhart - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Logic 5:66-73.
Some Metacomplete Relevant Modal Logics.Takahiro Seki - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (5):1115-1141.
To distribute or not to distribute?Jean-Yves Béziau & Marcelo E. Coniglio - 2011 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 19 (4):466-583.
Realism in Mathematics.John Slaney - 1992 - Philosophical Books 33 (1):61-62.
'Entailment' Survives Lewy's Paradoxes.John K. Slaney - 1981 - Analysis 41 (4):188 - 191.


Added to PP

8 (#1,169,970)

6 months
2 (#785,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Branden Fitelson
Northeastern University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references