Dissent from “the new consensus”: Reply to Friedman

Critical Review 6 (1):83-96 (1992)
Abstract
This is a rejoinder to some of the contentions of Part II of Jeffrey Friedman's monster article (or mini?book?) about ?The New Consensus.? After questioning his supposedly ?non?tendentious understanding of Marx,? it proceeds to deny that what Friedman calls Positive Libertarianism is any more a sort of libertarianism than imaginary or non?existent cows are a kind of cows; and to insist that what Friedman calls morality is light years removed from the dutiful, domestic decencies of what would normally be considered moral conduct. Next it examines Friedman's misunderstandings of option rights, which actually presuppose only the weakest possible claims to equality. Finally it concludes with criticism of his bizarre and perverse assumption that concern about the consequences of our actions has little or nothing rather than almost everything to do with their morality.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/08913819208443254
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,687
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What's Wrong with Libertarianism.Jeffrey Friedman - 1997 - Critical Review 11 (3):407-467.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Why Friedman's Methodology Did Not Generate Consensus Among Economists?David Teira - 2009 - Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (2):201-214.
Reply to Flage's On Friedman's Look.Lesley Friedman - 1993 - Hume Studies 19 (1):199-202.
Smith, Friedman, and Self-Interest in Ethical Society.Farhad Rassekh - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):659-674.
The Rhetoric of Friedman's Quantity Theory Manifesto.Thomas Mayer - 1997 - Journal of Economic Methodology 4 (2):199-220.

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2011-10-18

Total downloads

0

Recent downloads (6 months)

0

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums