Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):517-32 (2008)

Authors
Guy Fletcher
University of Edinburgh
Abstract
In this paper, I examine how philosophers before and after G. E. Moore understood intrinsic value. The main idea I wish to bring out and defend is that Moore was insufficiently attentive to how distinctive his conception of intrinsic value was, as compared with those of the writers he discussed, and that such inattentiveness skewed his understanding of the positions of others that he discussed and dismissed. My way into this issue is by examining the charge of inconsistency that Moore levels at the qualitative hedonism outlined by J. S. Mill in Utilitarianism. Along the way I suggest that there are a number of ways in which Moore was unfair in rejecting qualitative hedonism as inconsistent. I close by relating the issues that arise in discussion of Moore to contemporary debates on value and reasons.
Keywords G E Moore  J S Mill  Intrinsic Value
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0037-802X
DOI 10.5840/soctheorpract200834428
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Intrinsic Vs. Extrinsic Value.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Value Theory.Mark Schroeder - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What’s the Use of an Intrinsic Property?Carrie Figdor - 2014 - In Robert M. Francescotti (ed.), Companion to Intrinsic Properties. De Gruyter. pp. 139-156.
The Authority of Competence and Quality as Extrinsic.Dale Dorsey - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):78 - 99.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Scanlon Versus Moore on Goodness.Philip Stratton-Lake & Brad Hooker - 2006 - In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press. pp. 149.
Brown and Moore's Value Invariabilism Vs Dancy's Variabilism.Guy Fletcher - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):162-168.
Objective and Unconditioned Value.Rae Langton - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):157-185.
Hyperventilating About Intrinsic Value.Fred Feldman - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (4):339-354.
Physicalism and Moorean Supervenience.Thomas W. Polger - 2013 - Analytic Philosophy 54 (1):72-92.
The Philosophy of G. E. Moore.Paul Arthur Schilpp - 1952 - New York: Tudor Pub. Co..
Retribution and Organic Unities.Michael Clark - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):351-358.
Is Intrinsic Value Conditional?Ben Bradley - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (1):23 - 44.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-07-21

Total views
1,084 ( #4,278 of 2,439,041 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #19,429 of 2,439,041 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes