On Hatzimoysis on sentimental value
Philosophia 37 (1):149-152 (2009)
Abstract
Despite its apparent ubiquity, philosophers have not talked much about sentimental value. One exception is Anthony Hatzimoysis (The Philosophical Quarterly 53:373–379, 2003). Those who wish to take sentimental value seriously are likely to make use of Christine Korsgaard’s ideas on two distinctions in value. In this paper I show that Hatzimoysis has misrendered Korsgaard’s insight in his discussion of sentimental value. I begin by briefly summarising Korsgaard’s idea before showing how Hatzimoysis’ treatment of it is mistaken.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1007/s11406-008-9142-8
My notes
Similar books and articles
A sartrean critique of introspection.Anthony Hatzimoysis - 2010 - In Jonathan Webber (ed.), Reading Sartre: On Phenomenology and Existentialism. Routledge.
Laughing At The Death Of Little Nell: Sentimental Art And Sentimental People.Marcia Eaton - 1989 - American Philosophical Quarterly 26 (4):269-282.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
163 (#78,750)
6 months
37 (#35,592)
2009-01-28
Downloads
163 (#78,750)
6 months
37 (#35,592)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
An Expanded Conception of Sentimental Value.Rochelle DuFord - 2017 - Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (1):1-11.
References found in this work
The strike of the demon: On fitting pro‐attitudes and value.Wlodek Rabinowicz & Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen - 2004 - Ethics 114 (3):391-423.