On Hatzimoysis on sentimental value

Philosophia 37 (1):149-152 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite its apparent ubiquity, philosophers have not talked much about sentimental value. One exception is Anthony Hatzimoysis (The Philosophical Quarterly 53:373–379, 2003). Those who wish to take sentimental value seriously are likely to make use of Christine Korsgaard’s ideas on two distinctions in value. In this paper I show that Hatzimoysis has misrendered Korsgaard’s insight in his discussion of sentimental value. I begin by briefly summarising Korsgaard’s idea before showing how Hatzimoysis’ treatment of it is mistaken.

Similar books and articles

Sentimental value.Guy Fletcher - 2009 - Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (1):55-65.
Ontology and Axiology.Anthony Hatzimoysis - 1997 - Philosophy 72 (280):293 - 296.
Sentimental value.Anthony Hatzimoysis - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):373–379.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
163 (#78,750)

6 months
37 (#35,592)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Guy Fletcher
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

An Expanded Conception of Sentimental Value.Rochelle DuFord - 2017 - Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (1):1-11.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Creating the Kingdom of Ends.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Two distinctions in goodness.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):169-195.
Creating the Kingdom of Ends.Allen W. Wood - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (4):607.
Rethinking intrinsic value.Shelly Kagan - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (4):277-297.

View all 14 references / Add more references