Samuel C. Fletcher
University of Minnesota
Stephen Hawking, among others, has proposed that the topological stability of a property of space-time is a necessary condition for it to be physically significant. What counts as stable, however, depends crucially on the choice of topology. Some physicists have thus suggested that one should find a canonical topology, a single ‘right’ topology for every inquiry. While certain such choices might be initially motivated, some little-discussed examples of Robert Geroch and some propositions of my own show that the main candidates—and each possible choice, to some extent—faces the horns of a no-go result. I suggest that instead of trying to decide what the ‘right’ topology is for all problems, one should let the details of particular types of problems guide the choice of an appropriate topology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axu044
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,217
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Papers.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.Hans Halvorson - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.
Time Travel and Time Machines.Chris Smeenk & Christian Wuthrich - 2009 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 577-630.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Categories and the Foundations of Classical Field Theories.James Owen Weatherall - forthcoming - In Elaine Landry (ed.), Categories for the Working Philosopher. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
The Implementation, Interpretation, and Justification of Likelihoods in Cosmology.C. D. McCoy - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62:19-35.
Towards a theory of emergence for the physical sciences.Sebastian De Haro - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (3):1-52.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Zeeman-Göbel Topologies.Adrian Heathcote - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):247-261.
Time, Topology and Physical Geometry.Tim Maudlin - 2010 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):63-78.
Fuzzy Topology Representation for MV‐Algebras.Jialu Zhang & Quanfa Chen - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (3):259-270.
Inductively Generated Formal Topologies.Thierry Coquand, Giovanni Sambin, Jan Smith & Silvio Valentini - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 124 (1-3):71-106.
On the Formal Points of the Formal Topology of the Binary Tree.Silvio Valentini - 2002 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 41 (7):603-618.
Disasters in Topology Without the Axiom of Choice.Kyriakos Keremedis - 2001 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 40 (8):569-580.
Linear Structures, Causal Sets and Topology.Laurenz Hudetz - 2015 - Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.
Field Theory onR×S 3 Topology. VI: Gravitation. [REVIEW]M. Carmeli & S. Malin - 1987 - Foundations of Physics 17 (4):407-417.
Menger and Nöbeling on Pointless Topology.Mathieu Bélanger & Jean-Pierre Marquis - 2013 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 22 (2):145-165.
Type-Definable and Invariant Groups in O-Minimal Structures.Jana Maříková - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (1):67 - 80.
Are Causality Violations Undesirable?Hunter Monroe - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (11):1065-1069.


Added to PP index

Total views
78 ( #117,375 of 2,324,933 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #136,981 of 2,324,933 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes