Ratio 22 (3):359-368 (2009)

Authors
Guy Fletcher
University of Edinburgh
Abstract
A critical notice of Terence Cuneo's The Normative Web and Hallvard Lillehammer's Companions in Guilt: Arguments for Ethical Objectivity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2009.00438.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Companions in Guilt Arguments Won't Work.C. Cowie - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (256):407-422.
Pain for the Moral Error Theory? A New Companions-in-Guilt Argument.Guy Fletcher - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):474-482.
Companions in Guilt Arguments.Christopher Cowie - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (11):e12528.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Uneasy Virtue.Roger Crisp - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):238-240.
Response to My Critics.Julia Driver - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (1):33-41.
Psychology: Companions to Ancient Thought, Vol. 2.Stephen Everson (ed.) - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Joan of Arc and Her Companions.C. A. Herbst - 1938 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 13 (2):347-347.
Review: Uneasy Virtue. [REVIEW]Christine Swanton - 2003 - Mind 112 (447):533-536.
Julia Driver, Uneasy Virtue.J. M. Greenberg - 2003 - Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (2):271-274.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-07-17

Total views
274 ( #35,340 of 2,454,849 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #29,407 of 2,454,849 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes