In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Ithaca: Oxford University Press (1998)
AbstractThis article attempts to spell out more clearly the Thomist, the Openist, and the Molinist approaches to divine providence, and to indicate the strengths and weaknesses of these three positions. It begins by discussing both the traditional notion of divine providence and the libertarian picture of freedom. The article then argues that each theory of divine providence has its advantages and disadvantages. Each has had numerous able and creative defenders. As with most philosophical disputes, one can hardly expect this debate to come to an end. The field of battle may shift more clearly in the coming years to considerations of which view, when applied to specific doctrines, offers us the most satisfying overall position. Still, it seems quite likely that all three positions will continue to be defended for the foreseeable future.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Molinism: Explaining Our Freedom Away.Nevin Climenhaga & Daniel Rubio - 2022 - Mind 131 (522):459-485.
The Dependence Response and Explanatory Loops.Andrew Law - 2020 - Faith and Philosophy 37 (3):294-307.
Scepticism About the Argument From Divine Hiddenness.Justin P. Mcbrayer & Philip Swenson - 2012 - Religious Studies 48 (2):129 - 150.
Divine Providence and Chance in the World: Replies.Dariusz Łukasiewicz - 2020 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 68 (3):5-34.
Similar books and articles
Providence and Evil: The Stanton Lectures 1971-2.Peter Geach - 1977 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Without the Net of Providence: Atheism and the Human Adventure.Kenneth A. Taylor - 2007 - In Louise M. Antony (ed.), Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 150-164.
Gersonides: Judaism Within the Limits of Reason.Seymour Feldman - 2010 - Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
Thomas P. Flint, Divine Providence: The Molinist Account. [REVIEW]David P. Hunt - 2000 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47 (1):62-64.
Thomas P. Flint Divine Providence. (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1998). Pp. XI+258. £35.00 Hbk.Paul Helm - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (1):99-111.
On Polkinghorne’s Unification of General Providence, Special Providence and Miracle.Morgan Luck - 2010 - Sophia 49 (4):577-589.
Divine Law and Political Philosophy in Plato's Laws.Mark J. Lutz - 2012 - Northern Illinois University Press.