Journal of Philosophy 97 (11):624-632 (2000)

Authors
Juliet Floyd
Boston University
Abstract
A look at Wittgenstein's comments on the incompleteness theorem with an inter-pretation that is consistent with what Gödel proved.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0022-362X
DOI 10.2307/2678455
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,795
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Gödel Paradox and Wittgenstein's Reasons.Francesco Berto - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Query the Triple Loophole of the Proof of Gödel Incompleteness Theorem.FangWen Yuan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 41:77-94.
More on ‘The Philosophical Significance of Gödel’s Theorem’.A. W. Moore - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 55 (1):103-126.
More on ‘The Philosophical Significance of Gödel’s Theorem’.A. W. Moore - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 55 (1):103-126.
The Gödel Paradox and Wittgenstein's Reasons.Francesco Berto - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.
Godel's Theorem in Focus.S. G. Shanker (ed.) - 1990 - Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
58 ( #178,917 of 2,438,794 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #50,716 of 2,438,794 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes