Einstein's 1935 Derivation of E=mc2

Abstract
Einstein’s 1935 derivation of mass—energy equivalence is philosophically important because it contains both a criticism of purported demonstrations that proceed by analogy and strong motivations for the definitions of the ‘new’ dynamical quantities. In this paper, I argue that Einstein’s criticism and insights are still relevant today by showing how his derivation goes beyond Friedman’s demonstration of this result in his Foundations of Spacetime ¹heories. Along the way, I isolate three distinct physical claims associated with Einstein’s famous equation that are sometimes not clearly distinguished in philosophical discussions of spacetime theory
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S1355-2198(98)00007-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,685
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Einstein's 1935 Derivation of E=Mc.Francisco Flores - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 29 (2):223-243.
Understanding Einstein's 1905 Derivation of E=Mc2.N. David Mermin - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 42 (1):1-2.
A Comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 Derivation of E=Mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 43 (3):215-217.
Interpretations of Einstein's Equation E = Mc.Francisco Flores - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):245 – 260.
Did Einstein Prove E=Mc2?Hans C. Ohanian - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (2):167-173.
On the Interpretation of the Equation E = Mc2: Response to Krajewski.Francisco Flores - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):217 – 218.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory.Arthur Fine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Conceptual and Derivation Systems.Jiří Raclavský & Petr Kuchyňka - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (1-2):159-174.
In Defence of Einstein.Gerald Keaney - 2008 - Crossroads 3 (1):64-68 Free Online.
Einstein and Aquinas: A Rapprochement.John F. Kiley - 1970 - The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-13

Total downloads

35 ( #145,188 of 2,158,296 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #53,335 of 2,158,296 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums