Problems with the Garber-dear theory of the disappearance of Descartes's method

Philosophical Studies 117 (1-2):131-141 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/b:phil.0000014530.46358.be

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Divine Activity and Motive Power in Descartes's Physics.Andrew R. Platt - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):623 - 646.
Comments on Daniel Garber's Leibniz: Body, Substance Monad for the Eastern.Jeffrey McDonough - unknown
Descartes' physics.Daniel Garber - 1992 - In John Cottingham (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 286--334.
Comments on Daniel Garber's Metaphysics and Theology: The Role of the Monadology in Leibniz's Essais de Théodicée.Jeffrey K. McDonough - manuscript
Descartes and Method in 1637.Daniel Garber - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:225-236.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#458,553)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How Berkeley's Gardener Knows his Cherry Tree.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):553-576.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Method and the Study of Nature.Peter Dear - 1998 - In Daniel Garber & Michael Ayers (eds.), The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1.
Descartes and Method in 1637.Daniel Garber - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:225-236.

Add more references