The Importance of Biology for the Social Sciences

Ratio (Misc.) 28 (1):1 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The philosophy of biology.David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.) - 1973 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Lessons from biology for philosophy of the human sciences.Alex Rosenberg - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1):3-19.
Evolution and the social sciences.Robin I. M. Dunbar - 2007 - History of the Human Sciences 20 (2):29-50.
Defending laws in the social sciences.Harold Kincaid - 1990 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):56?83.
Response to Stephen T. Casper and Steve Fuller.Chris Renwick - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (4):515-521.
Judgments of causal importance in the social sciences.R. G. Frey - 1976 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 6 (3):245-248.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references