Linguistic Inquiry 29:269-288 (1998)
A certain metaphysical thesis about meaning that we'll call Informational Role Semantics (IRS) is accepted practically universally in linguistics, philosophy and the cognitive sciences: the meaning (or content, or `sense') of a linguistic expression1 is constituted, at least in part, by at least some of its inferential relations. This idea is hard to state precisely, both because notions like metaphysical constitution are moot and, more importantly, because different versions of IRS take different views on whether there are constituents of meaning other than inferential role, and on which of the inferences an expression occurs in are meaning constitutive. Some of these issues will presently concern us; but for now it will do just to gesture towards such familiar claims as that: it's part and parcel of dog meaning dog2 that the inference from x is a dog to x is an animal is valid; it's part and parcel of boil meaning boil that the inference from x boiled y to y boiled is valid; it's part and parcel of kill meaning kill that the inference from x killed y to y died is valid; and so on. (See Cruse, Ch. 1 and passim.) IRS brings in its train a constellation of ancillary doctrines. Presumably, for example, if an inference is constitutive of the meaning of a word, then learning the word involves learning that the inference holds. If dog means dog because dog ---> animal is valid, then knowing that dog ---> animal is valid is part and parcel of knowing what the word dog means; and, similarly, learning that x boiled y ---> y boiled is part and parcel of learning what boil means, and so forth. IRS constrains grammatical theories. The semantic lexicon of a language is supposed to make explicit whatever one has to know to understand the lexical expressions of the language, so IRS implies that meaning constitutive inferences are part of the semantic lexical entries for items that have them. Lexical entries are thus typically complex objects (`bundles of inferences') according to standard interpretations of IRS..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
From Impossible Words to Conceptual Structure: The Role of Structure and Processes in the Lexicon.Kent Johnson - 2004 - Mind and Language 19 (3):334-358.
Reading Time Evidence for Enriched Composition.Brian McElree, Matthew J. Traxler, Martin J. Pickering, Rachel E. Seely & Ray Jackendoff - 2001 - Cognition 78 (1):B17-B25.
The but Not All: A Partitive Account of Plural Definite Descriptions.Berit Brogaard - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (4):402–426.
Modality, Scale Structure, and Scalar Reasoning.Daniel Lassiter - 2014 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (4):461-490.
Logical Metonymy Resolution in a Words‐as‐Cues Framework: Evidence From Self‐Paced Reading and Probe Recognition.Alessandra Zarcone, Sebastian Padó & Alessandro Lenci - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (5):973-996.
Similar books and articles
The Language of Word Meaning.Pierrette Bouillon & Federica Busa (eds.) - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
Why Compositionality Won't Go Away: Reflections on Horwich's 'Deflationary' Theory.Jerry Fodor & Ernie Lepore - 2001 - Ratio 14 (4):350–368.
Conservatives and Racists: Inferential Role Semantics and Pejoratives.Daniel J. Whiting - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (3):375-388.
Meaning Holism and de Re Ascription.Daniel Whiting - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):pp. 575-599.
Meaning Holism and De Re Ascription.Daniel Whiting - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):575-599.
Towards a Type-Theoretical Account of Lexical Semantics.Christian Bassac, Bruno Mery & Christian Retoré - 2010 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (2):229-245.
Copredication, Dynamic Generalized Quantiﬁcation and Lexical Innovation by Coercion.Robin Cooper - unknown
Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization.Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay (eds.) - 1992 - L. Erlbaum Associates.
Cross-Situational and Supervised Learning in the Emergence of Communication.Jose Fernando Fontanari & Angelo Cangelosi - 2011 - Interaction Studies 12 (1):119-133.
Why Rationalist Compositionality Won't Go Away (Either).Víctor M. Verdejo - 2009 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 24 (1):29-47.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads51 ( #102,928 of 2,172,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,337 of 2,172,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?