Perceiving Bodies Immediately: Thomas Reid's Insight

History of Philosophy Quarterly 32 (1):19-36 (2015)

Authors
Marina Folescu
University of Missouri, Columbia
Abstract
In An Inquiry into the Human Mind and in Essays on Intellectual Powers, Thomas Reid discusses what kinds of things perceivers are related to in perception. Are these things qualities of bodies, the bodies themselves, or both? This question places him in a long tradition of philosophers concerned with understanding how human perception works in connecting us with the external world. It is still an open question in the philosophy of perception whether the human perceptual system is providing us with representations as of bodies, or only as of their properties. My project in this article is to explain how, on Reid's view, we can have perceptual representations as of bodies. This, in turn, enables him to argue that we have a robust understanding of the world around us, an understanding that would be missing if our perceptual system only supplied us with representations as of free-floating properties of bodies.
Keywords history of philosophy  Reid  perception of bodies  perception of qualities  immediacy of perception  history of philosophy of mind  history of philosophy of psychology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reid and Berkeley on Scepticism, Representationalism, and Ideas.Peter West - 2019 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 17 (3):191-210.
Thomas Reid on Signs and Language.Lewis Powell - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (3):e12409.
Remembering Events: A Reidean Account of Memory.Marina Folescu - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97 (2):304-321.
Replies to Falkenstein, Copenhaver, and Winkler.James Van Cleve - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (1):232-245.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Correspondence of Thomas Reid.Thomas Reid - 2002 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
In Defense of Thomas Reid's Use of 'Suggestion'.Ronald E. Beanblossom - 1975 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 1 (1):19-24.
Reid and Priestley on Method and the Mind.Alan Tapper - 2003 - In John Haldane Stephen Read (ed.), The Philosophy of Thomas Reid. pp. 98-112.
Thomas Reid and Non-Euclidean Geometry.Amit Hagar - 2002 - Reid Studies 5 (2):54-64.
The Problem with Reid's Direct Realism.Todd Buras - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):457-477.
Thomas Reid on the Foundations of Knowledge and His Answer to Skepticism.Paul Vernier - 1976 - In Stephen Francis Barker & Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.), Thomas Reid: Critical Interpretations. University City Science Center. pp. 14--24.
An Essay by Thomas Reid on the Conception of Power.Thomas Reid & John Haldane - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (202):1-12.
9 Thomas Reid's Theory of Freedom and Responsibility.William L. Rowe - 2004 - In Terence Cuneo Rene van Woudenberg (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge University Press. pp. 222.
Is Thomas Reid a Mysterian?Rebecca Copenhaver - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):449-466.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-10-26

Total views
190 ( #41,684 of 2,286,500 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #27,211 of 2,286,500 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature